Cited by 494Social and Intergroup PsychologyGender Diversity and InequalityNames, Identity, and Discrimination Research

The White standard: racial bias in leader categorization

Rosette, Ashleigh Shelby, Leonardelli, Geoffrey J., Phillips, Katherine W.·2008·Journal of Applied Psychology

Abstract

In 4 experiments, the authors investigated whether race is perceived to be part of the business leader prototype and, if so, whether it could explain differences in evaluations of White and non-White leaders. The first 2 studies revealed that "being White" is perceived to be an attribute of the business leader prototype, where participants assumed that business leaders more than nonleaders were White, and this inference occurred regardless of base rates about the organization's racial composition (Study 1), the racial composition of organizational roles, the business industry, and the types of racial minority groups in the organization (Study 2). The final 2 studies revealed that a leader categorization explanation could best account for differences in White and non-White leader evaluations, where White targets were evaluated as more effective leaders (Study 3) and as having more leadership potential (Study 4), but only when the leader had recently been given credit for organizational success, consistent with the prediction that leader prototypes are more likely to be used when they confirm and reinforce individualized information about a leader's performance. The results demonstrate a connection between leader race and leadership categorization.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0021-9010.93.4.758

Cites

112 of 112 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Leadership has a White standard in addition to a masculinity standard.

    “For example, in addition to having a masculinity standard, leadership also has a White standard.”

    From Managing to clear the air: Stereotype threat, women, and leadership (2016) · cites this paper as Rosette, Leonardelli, & Phillips, 2008

  • Being White is a central component of the leader prototype in America.

    “Namely, being White has been shown to be a central component of the leader prototype in America (Rosette, Leonardelli, & Phillips, 2008).”

    From Managing to clear the air: Stereotype threat, women, and leadership (2016) · cites this paper as Rosette, Leonardelli, & Phillips, 2008

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rosette, A. S., Leonardelli, G. J., & Phillips, K. W.
Affiliations
  • Duke University (US)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • Northwestern University (US)
Venue
Journal of Applied Psychology
Published
2008-07
Volume
93
Issue
4
Pages
758-777
ISSN
  • 0021-9010 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1854
OpenAlex
W1983478891
Cited by
494
References
112
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 49 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 16
FWCI
39.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Applied Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Diversity and Inequality
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research
Keywords
racial bias, leader evaluation, leadership effectiveness, leadership potential, racial stereotypes, organizational success, personalized information
MeSH terms
Asian, Ethnicity, Female, Hispanic or Latino, Humans, Leadership, Male, Personality, Surveys and Questionnaires, Black People, White People

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review