Logic and human reasoning: An assessment of the deduction paradigm.

Abstract

The study of deductive reasoning has been a major paradigm in psychology for approximately the past 40 years. Research has shown that people make many logical errors on such tasks and are strongly influenced by problem content and context. It is argued that this paradigm was developed in a context of logicist thinking that is now outmoded. Few reasoning researchers still believe that logic is an appropriate normative system for most human reasoning, let alone a model for describing the process of human reasoning, and many use the paradigm principally to study pragmatic and probabilistic processes. It is suggested that the methods used for studying reasoning be reviewed, especially the instructional context, which necessarily defines pragmatic influences as biases.

Cites (146)

1. Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases: Biases in judgments reveal some heuristics of thinking under uncertainty.
   Tversky, Amos, Kahneman, Daniel · 1974 · Science
2. Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
   Tversky, Amos, Kahneman, Daniel · 1975 · Utility, Probability, and Human Decision Making
3. Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability
   Tversky, Amos, Kahneman, Daniel · 1973 · Cognitive Psychology
4. Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
   1982
5. The Logic of Scientific Discovery
   2013 · A Realist Theory of Science
6. The Logic of Scientific Discovery.
   Hutchison, T. W., Popper, Karl R. · 1959 · Economica
7. Human Problem Solving
   Allen Newell · 1972
8. Mental Models
   Philip Nicholas Johnson-Laird · 1983
9. Subjective probability: A judgment of representativeness
   Kahneman, Daniel, Tversky, Amos · 1972 · Cognitive Psychology
10. Judgment under uncertainty: List of contributors
    Daniel J. Kahneman, Paul Slovic, Amos Tversky · 1982

Show all 146 references

Cited by (16)

1. Dual-Processing Accounts of Reasoning, Judgment, and Social Cognition
   Evans, Jonathan St. B. T. · 2008 · Annual Review of Psychology
2. Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory
   Mercier, Hugo, Sperber, Dan · 2011 · Behavioral and Brain Sciences
3. Epistemic Vigilance
   SPERBER, DAN, CLÉMENT, FABRICE, HEINTZ, CHRISTOPHE, MASCARO, OLIVIER, MERCIER, HUGO, ORIGGI, GLORIA, WILSON, DEIRDRE · 2010 · Mind & Language
4. In two minds: dual-process accounts of reasoning
   Evans, Jonathan St.B.T. · 2003 · Trends in Cognitive Sciences
5. The origin of mind: Evolution of brain, cognition, and general intelligence.
   Geary, David C. · 2005

See all 431