Superior-subordinate communication: The state of the art.

Fredric M. Jablin·1979·Psychological Bulletin

Abstract

Based on a review of the literature, empirical research in the area of superiorsubordinate communication is classified into nine topical categories and critically examined. Inspection of this literature suggests that researchers have focused the majority of their attention on studying (a) the effects of power and status on superior-subo rdinate communication, (b) trust as a moderator of superior-subo rdinate communication, and (c) semantic-information distance as a source of misunderstand ing in superior-subo rdinate communication. It is concluded that future research should increasingly be developmental and longitudinal in nature and should take into greater consideration the effects situational variables have on communication in the superior-subordinate dyad. Status hierarchy is inherent in the nature of purposeful organizations. As Redding (1972) observes, within organizations are 'superiors' and 'subordinates'—even though these terms may not be expressly used, and even though there may exist fluid arrangements whereby superior and subordinates roles may be reversible (p. 18). How superiors and subordinates interact and communicate to achieve both personal and organizational goals has been an object of investigation by social scientists for most of the 20th century. Empirical research examining superior-subordinate communication is diverse, is strewn across a multitude of disciplines, lacks coherent organization and classification, and in general, has not received sufficient review and interpretation as a body of literature. The present article attempts to alleviate this confusion by reviewing, classifying, interpreting, and providing directions for future research in the area of organizational communication that is loosely termed superior-subordinate communication. This article focuses on empirical research solely in the domain of organizationa l communication. To avoid generalizations from communication research outside of the orga

Cites (4)

  1. Some Social and Psychological Consequences of the Longwall Method of Coal-Getting: An Examination of the Psychological Situation and Defences of a Work Group in Relation to the Social Structure and Technological Content of the Work System
    Trist, E. L., Bamforth, K. W. · 1951 · Human Relations
  2. Validation and extension of the contingency model of leadership effectiveness: A review of empirical findings
    Fiedler, Fred E. · 1971 · Psychological Bulletin
  3. The distortion of upward communication in hierarchical organizations
    Athanassiades, J. C. · 1973 · Academy of Management Journal
  4. A Comparative Study of Unilateral and Bilateral Communication
    Haney, W. V. · 1964 · Academy of Management Journal

Show all 4 references

Cited by (5)

  1. Multiparadigm perspectives on theory building
    Gioia, Dennis A., Pitre, Evelyn · 1990 · The Academy of Management Review
  2. Back to the future: revisiting Kotter's 1996 change model
    Appelbaum, Steven H., Habashy, Sally, Malo, Jean‐Luc, Shafiq, Hisham · 2012 · Journal of Management Development
  3. A management communication strategy for change
    Klein, Stuart M. · 1996 · Journal of Organizational Change Management
  4. An Examination of the Role of Listening in Judgments of Communication Competence in Co-Workers
    Haas, J. W., Arnold, C. L. · 1995 · Journal of Business Communication
  5. Management and virtual decentralised networks: The Linux project
    Dafermos, George N. · 2001 · First Monday

See all 425

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Superior-subordinate communication: The state of the art. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0033-2909.86.6.1201
The paper
Jablin, F. M. (1979). Superior-subordinate communication: The state of the art. Psychological Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.86.6.1201

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.