Cited by 96Communication Studies and MediaJob Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorManagement Theory and Practice

The distortion of upward communication in hierarchical organizations

Athanassiades, J. C.·1973·Academy of Management Journal

Abstract

Distortion of upward communication by subordinates is viewed as instrumental for attainment of need-goals. The study investigates relationships between distortion of upward communication, needs of ...

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/255323

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Athanassiades, J. C.
Affiliations
Georgia State University (US)
Corresponding author
Athanassiades, J. C.
Venue
Academy of Management Journal
Published
1973-06-01
Volume
16
Issue
2
Pages
207-226
ISSN
  • 0001-4273 (ISSN-L)
  • 1948-0989
OpenAlex
W2180818507
Cited by
96
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
FWCI
11.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Academy of Management Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Communication Studies and Media
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management Theory and Practice
Keywords
upward communication, communication distortion, hierarchy, subordinates, goal achievement, organizational hierarchy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review