Is it time to pull the plug on hostile versus instrumental aggression dichotomy?
Abstract
Psychologists have often categorized human aggression as hostile or instrumental. Hostile aggression is "hot," impulsive behavior that is motivated by a desire to hurt someone; instrumental aggression is "cold," premeditated behavior used as a means to some other end. This dichotomy was useful to the early development of aggression theories and continues to capture important features of nonhuman aggression, but it has outlived its usefulness as a descriptor of fundamentally different kinds of human aggression. It is confounded with the automatic-controlled information-processing dichotomy, and it fails to consider aggressive acts with multiple motives. Knowledge structure models of aggression easily handle these problems. Taking extreme measures to preserve the hostile-instrumental dichotomy will delay further advances in understanding and controlling human aggression. Therefore, this seems a proper time to "pull the plug" and allow the hostile-instrumental aggression dichotomy a dignified death.
Cites (53)
- A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing.Collins, Allan M., Loftus, Elizabeth F. · 1975 · Psychological Review
- Handbook of Social Psychology2013 · Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research
- Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending, and a general theoryShiffrin, Richard M., Schneider, Walter · 1977 · Psychological Review
- Controlled and automatic human information processing: I. Detection, search, and attention.Schneider, Walter, Shiffrin, Richard M. · 1977 · Psychological Review
- A review and reformulation of social information-processing mechanisms in children's social adjustmentCrick, Nicki R., Dodge, Kenneth A. · 1994 · Psychological Bulletin
- Social psychology: handbook of basic principles2008 · Choice Reviews Online
- Social psychology: handbook of basic principles1997 · Choice Reviews Online
- Pretense and representation: The origins of "theory of mind."Leslie, Alan M. · 1987 · Psychological Review
- Scripts, Plans, Goals, and Understanding: An Inquiry into Human Knowledge StructuresKronenfeld, David B., Schank, Roger C., Abelson, Robert P. · 1978 · Language
- Scripts, Plans, Goals, and Understanding: An Inquiry into Human Knowledge StructuresHunt, Earl, Schank, Roger, Abelson, Robert · 1979 · The American Journal of Psychology
Cited by (16)
- Human AggressionAnderson, Craig A., Bushman, Brad J. · 2002 · Annual Review of Psychology
- Abusive Supervision in Work Organizations: Review, Synthesis, and Research AgendaTepper, Bennett J. · 2007 · Journal of Management
- Neurobiology of Aggression and ViolenceSiever, Larry J. · 2008 · American Journal of Psychiatry
- “Isn’t It Fun to Get the Respect That We’re Going to Deserve?” Narcissism, Social Rejection, and AggressionTwenge, Jean M., Campbell, W. Keith · 2003 · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
- The general aggression model: theoretical extensions to violenceDeWall, C. Nathan, Anderson, Craig A., Bushman, Brad J. · 2011 · Psychology of Violence
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Is it time to pull the plug on hostile versus instrumental aggression dichotomy? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0033-295x.108.1.273
- The paper
- Bushman, B. J., & Anderson, C. A. (2001). Is it time to pull the plug on hostile versus instrumental aggression dichotomy? Psychological Review. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-295x.108.1.273
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.