Is it time to pull the plug on hostile versus instrumental aggression dichotomy?

Brad J. Bushman, Craig A. Anderson·2001·Psychological Review

Abstract

Psychologists have often categorized human aggression as hostile or instrumental. Hostile aggression is "hot," impulsive behavior that is motivated by a desire to hurt someone; instrumental aggression is "cold," premeditated behavior used as a means to some other end. This dichotomy was useful to the early development of aggression theories and continues to capture important features of nonhuman aggression, but it has outlived its usefulness as a descriptor of fundamentally different kinds of human aggression. It is confounded with the automatic-controlled information-processing dichotomy, and it fails to consider aggressive acts with multiple motives. Knowledge structure models of aggression easily handle these problems. Taking extreme measures to preserve the hostile-instrumental dichotomy will delay further advances in understanding and controlling human aggression. Therefore, this seems a proper time to "pull the plug" and allow the hostile-instrumental aggression dichotomy a dignified death.

Cites (53)

  1. A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing.
    Collins, Allan M., Loftus, Elizabeth F. · 1975 · Psychological Review
  2. Handbook of Social Psychology
    2013 · Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research
  3. Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending, and a general theory
    Shiffrin, Richard M., Schneider, Walter · 1977 · Psychological Review
  4. Controlled and automatic human information processing: I. Detection, search, and attention.
    Schneider, Walter, Shiffrin, Richard M. · 1977 · Psychological Review
  5. A review and reformulation of social information-processing mechanisms in children's social adjustment
    Crick, Nicki R., Dodge, Kenneth A. · 1994 · Psychological Bulletin
  6. Social psychology: handbook of basic principles
    2008 · Choice Reviews Online
  7. Social psychology: handbook of basic principles
    1997 · Choice Reviews Online
  8. Pretense and representation: The origins of "theory of mind."
    Leslie, Alan M. · 1987 · Psychological Review
  9. Scripts, Plans, Goals, and Understanding: An Inquiry into Human Knowledge Structures
    Kronenfeld, David B., Schank, Roger C., Abelson, Robert P. · 1978 · Language
  10. Scripts, Plans, Goals, and Understanding: An Inquiry into Human Knowledge Structures
    Hunt, Earl, Schank, Roger, Abelson, Robert · 1979 · The American Journal of Psychology

Show all 53 references

Cited by (16)

  1. Human Aggression
    Anderson, Craig A., Bushman, Brad J. · 2002 · Annual Review of Psychology
  2. Abusive Supervision in Work Organizations: Review, Synthesis, and Research Agenda
    Tepper, Bennett J. · 2007 · Journal of Management
  3. Neurobiology of Aggression and Violence
    Siever, Larry J. · 2008 · American Journal of Psychiatry
  4. “Isn’t It Fun to Get the Respect That We’re Going to Deserve?” Narcissism, Social Rejection, and Aggression
    Twenge, Jean M., Campbell, W. Keith · 2003 · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
  5. The general aggression model: theoretical extensions to violence
    DeWall, C. Nathan, Anderson, Craig A., Bushman, Brad J. · 2011 · Psychology of Violence

See all 916

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Is it time to pull the plug on hostile versus instrumental aggression dichotomy? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0033-295x.108.1.273
The paper
Bushman, B. J., & Anderson, C. A. (2001). Is it time to pull the plug on hostile versus instrumental aggression dichotomy? Psychological Review. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-295x.108.1.273

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.