Traps and gaps in action explanation: Theoretical problems of a psychology of human action.
Abstract
This article deals with the question of whether human action can be explained empirically by a psychological theory that refers to intentions, expectancies, and evaluations as determinants. In contrast with the majority of action theories in psychology and philosophy, a logical connection between action and intention is defended and, consequently, a causal relationship between action and intention is refuted. This is illustrated by reference to one of the most widely known and applied psychological action theories: the theory of planned behavior (I. Ajzen, 1991). However, the logical-connection argument can be circumvented if the existing research findings are reinterpreted as part of a psychology of intention. This article demonstrates the value of such an approach for future research. However, the final section of the article outlines some further fundamental theoretical difficulties for this perspective.
Cites (20)
- The theory of planned behaviorAjzen, Icek · 1991 · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
- From Intentions to Actions: A Theory of Planned BehaviorAjzen, Icek · 1985 · Action Control
- Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical researchAjzen, Icek, Fishbein, Martin · 1977 · Psychological Bulletin
- Prediction of goal-directed behavior: Attitudes, intentions, and perceived behavioral controlAjzen, Icek, Madden, Thomas J · 1986 · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
- Implementation intentions: Strong effects of simple plans.Gollwitzer, Peter M. · 1999 · American Psychologist
- Plans and the structure of behavior.Miller, George A., Galanter, Eugene, Pribram, Karl H. · 1960
- On the Self-Regulation of BehaviorCarver, Charles S., Scheier, Michael F. · 1998 · Cambridge University Press eBooks
- The Theory of Reasoned Action: A Meta-Analysis of Past Research with Recommendations for Modifications and Future ResearchSheppard, Blair H., Hartwick, Jon, Warshaw, Paul R. · 1988 · Journal of Consumer Research
- Habit and intention in everyday life: The multiple processes by which past behavior predicts future behavior.Ouellette, Judith A., Wood, Wendy · 1998 · Psychological Bulletin
- Extending the Theory of Planned Behavior: A Review and Avenues for Further ResearchConner, Mark, Armitage, Christopher J. · 1998 · Journal of Applied Social Psychology
Cited by (11)
- The nature of procrastination: a meta-analytic and theoretical review of quintessential self-regulatory failure.Steel, Piers · 2007 · Psychological bulletin
- Entrepreneurial Action And The Role Of Uncertainty In The Theory Of The EntrepreneurMcMullen, Jeffery S., Shepherd, Dean A. · 2006 · Academy of Management Review
- Habits in everyday life: Thought, emotion, and action.Wood, Wendy, Quinn, Jeffrey M., Kashy, Deborah A. · 2002 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Consumer attitudes and purchase intentions in relation to organic foods in Taiwan: Moderating effects of food-related personality traitsChen, Mei-Fang · 2007 · Food Quality and Preference
- Attitudes and PersuasionCrano, William D., Prislin, Radmila · 2006 · Annual Review of Psychology
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Traps and gaps in action explanation: Theoretical problems of a psychology of human action. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0033-295x.108.2.435
- The paper
- Greve, W. (2001). Traps and gaps in action explanation: Theoretical problems of a psychology of human action. Psychological Review. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-295x.108.2.435
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.