Varieties of perceptual independence.

Ashby, F. Gregory, Townsend, James T.·1986·Psychological Review
DOI 10.1037//0033-295x.93.2.154

Cites (2)

  1. Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat’s visual cortex
    Hubel, D. H., Wiesel, T. N. · 1962 · The Journal of Physiology
  2. The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders' method
    Sternberg, Saul · 1969 · Acta Psychologica

Show all 2 references

Cited by (10)

  1. Two visual systems and two theories of perception: An attempt to reconcile the constructivist and ecological approaches
    Norman, Joel · 2002 · Behavioral and Brain Sciences
  2. A neurobiological theory of automaticity in perceptual categorization
    Ashby, F. Gregory, Ennis, John M., Spiering, Brian J. · 2007 · Psychological Review
  3. A Note on ROC Analysis and Non-Parametric Estimate of Sensitivity
    Zhang, Jun, Mueller, Shane T. · 2005 · Psychometrika
  4. Categorization difficulty is associated with negative evaluation in the “uncanny valley” phenomenon
    YAMADA, YUKI, KAWABE, TAKAHIRO, IHAYA, KEIKO · 2013 · Japanese Psychological Research
  5. Dynamic Touch
    Turvey, M.T., Carello, Claudia · 1995 · Perception of Space and Motion

See all 721

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Varieties of perceptual independence. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0033-295x.93.2.154
The paper
Ashby, F. G., & Townsend, J. T. (1986). Varieties of perceptual independence. Psychological Review. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-295x.93.2.154

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.