Social comparison activity under threat: Downward evaluation and upward contacts.

Taylor, Shelley E., Lobel, Marci·1989·Psychological Review

Abstract

Social comparison processes include the desire to affiliate with others, the desire for information about others, and explicit self-evaluation against others. Previously these types of comparison activity and their corresponding measures have been treated as interchangeable. We present evidence that in certain groups under threat, these comparison activities diverge, with explicit self-evaluation made against a less fortunate target (downward evaluation), but information and affiliation sought out from more fortunate others (upward contacts). These effects occur because downward evaluation and upward contacts appear to serve different needs, the former ameliorating self-esteem and the latter enabling a person to improve his or her situation and simultaneously increase motivation and hope. Implications for the concept, measurement, and theory of social comparison are discussed.

Cites (40)

  1. “Stress: appraisal and coping,”
    Folkman, Susan · 2013 · Encyclopedia of Behavioral Medicine
  2. A theory of social comparison processes
    Festinger, Leon · 1954 · Human Relations
  3. Downward comparison principles in social psychology
    Wills, Thomas A. · 1981 · Psychological Bulletin
  4. The Psychology of affiliation
    Beech, H.R. · 1963 · Journal of Psychosomatic Research
  5. Social Comparison Processes: Theoretical and Empirical Perspectives.
    Pettigrew, Thomas F., Suls., Jerry M., Miller, Richard L. · 1979 · Contemporary Sociology
  6. Theories of Group Behavior
    1987 · Springer eBooks
  7. Social comparison in adjustment to breast cancer.
    Joanne V. Wood, Shelley E. Taylor, Rosemary R. Lichtman · 1985 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  8. It Could Be Worse: Selective Evaluation as a Response to Victimization
    Taylor, Shelley E., Wood, Joanne V., Lichtman, Rosemary R. · 1983 · Journal of Social Issues
  9. Long-term adjustment to physical disability: The role of social support, perceived control, and self-blame.
    Schulz, Richard, Decker, Susan · 1985 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  10. Social Support and the Cancer Patient: Conceptual and Methodologic Issues
    Wortman, Camille B. · 1984 · Cancer

Show all 40 references

Cited by (85)

  1. The emerging field of emotion regulation: an integrative review
    Gross, James J. · 1998 · Review of General Psychology
  2. Mechanisms Linking Social Ties and Support to Physical and Mental Health
    Thoits, Peggy A. · 2011 · Journal of Health and Social Behavior
  3. Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment.
    Kahneman, Daniel, Frederick, Shane · 2002 · Heuristics and Biases
  4. Untitled work
    2007
  5. The Affect Heuristic
    Slovic, Paul, Finucane, Melissa, Peters, Ellen, MacGregor, Donald G. · 2002 · Heuristics and Biases

See all 1,296

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Social comparison activity under threat: Downward evaluation and upward contacts. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0033-295x.96.4.569
The paper
Taylor, S. E., & Lobel, M. (1989). Social comparison activity under threat: Downward evaluation and upward contacts. Psychological Review. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-295x.96.4.569

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.