Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 240 of the 240 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Social stigma and self-esteem: The self-protective properties of stigma.

Crocker, Jennifer, Major, Brenda·1989·Psychological Review

Abstract

Although several psychological theories predict that members of stigmatized groups should have low global self-esteem, empirical research typically does not support this prediction. It is proposed here that this discrepancy may be explained by considering the ways in which membership in a stigmatized group may protect the self-concept It is proposed that members of stigmatized groups may (a) attribute negative feedback to prejudice against their group, (b) compare their outcomes with those of the ingroup, rather than with the relatively advantaged outgroup, and (c) selectively devalue those dimensions on which their group fares poorly and value those dimensions on which their group excels. Evidence for each of these processes and their consequences for self-esteem and motivation is reviewed. Factors that moderate the use of these strategies and implications of this analysis for treatment of stigmas are also discussed. For more than three decades, social psychological research on prejudice, stereotyping, and discrimination has examined both the content of stereotypes about a variety of social groups and the effects of these stereotypes on behavior toward members of those groups. Accumulated evidence has shown that many social groups or categories of people are stigmatized in our society. People hold generally negative stereotypes about such diverse

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0033-295x.96.4.608

Cites

240 of 240 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 240 references

Cited by

See all 3,426

Metadata

Authors
Crocker, J., & Major, B.
Affiliations
University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
Venue
Psychological Review
Published
1989-10
Volume
96
Issue
4
Pages
608-630
ISSN
  • 0033-295X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1471
OpenAlex
W2047982742
Cited by
3,426
References
240
Citations by year
2026: 63 · 2025: 76 · 2024: 73 · 2023: 108 · 2022: 130 · 2021: 118 · 2020: 171 · 2019: 123 · 2018: 120 · 2017: 160 · 2016: 151 · 2015: 162 · 2014: 148 · 2013: 150 · 2012: 149
FWCI
86.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Psychological Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
Keywords
social stigma, self-esteem, self-protection strategies, self-concept, prejudice, stereotyping, discrimination, motivation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Social stigma and self-esteem: The self-protective properties of stigma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/0033-295x.96.4.608
The paper
Crocker, J., & Major, B. (1989). Social stigma and self-esteem: The self-protective properties of stigma. Psychological Review. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.96.4.608

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.