Manipulation of stimulus onset delay in reading: Evidence for parallel programming of saccades.

Morrison, Robert E.·1984·Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Abstract

On-line eye movement recording of 12 subjects who read short stories on a cathode ray tube enabled a test of direct control and preprogramming models of eye movements in reading. Contingent upon eye position, a mask was displayed in place of the letters in central vision after each saccade, delaying the onset of the stimulus in each eye fixation. The duration of the delay was manipulated in fixed or randomized blocks. Although the length of the delay strongly affected the duration of the fixations, there was no difference due to the conditions of delay manipulation, indicating that fixation duration is under direct control. However, not all fixations were lengthened by the period of the delay. Some ended while the mask was still present, suggesting they had been preprogrammed. But these "anticipation" eye movements could not have been completely determined before the fixation was processed because their fixation durations and saccade lengths were affected by the spatial extent of the mask, which varied randomly. Neither preprogramming nor existing serial direct control models of eye guidance can adequately account for these data. Instead, a model with direct control and parallel programming of saccades is proposed to explain the data and eye movements in reading in general.

Cited by (7)

  1. Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research
    Rayner, Keith · 1998 · Psychological Bulletin
  2. The 35th Sir Frederick Bartlett Lecture: Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search
    Rayner, Keith · 2009 · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
  3. Parafoveal word processing during eye fixations in reading: Effects of word frequency
    Inhoff, Albrecht Werner, Rayner, Keith · 1986 · Perception & Psychophysics
  4. Our Eyes do Not Always Go Where we Want Them to Go: Capture of the Eyes by New Objects
    Theeuwes, Jan, Kramer, Arthur F., Hahn, Sowon, Irwin, David E. · 1998 · Psychological Science
  5. Effects of foveal processing difficulty on the perceptual span in reading: Implications for attention and eye movement control.
    John M. Henderson, Fernanda Ferreira · 1990 · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition

See all 400

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Manipulation of stimulus onset delay in reading: Evidence for parallel programming of saccades. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0096-1523.10.5.667
The paper
Morrison, R. E. (1984). Manipulation of stimulus onset delay in reading: Evidence for parallel programming of saccades. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. https://doi.org/10.1037//0096-1523.10.5.667

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.