Automatic stimulus-response translation in dual-task performance.

Abstract

In bottleneck models of overlapping-task performance, stimulus-response translation for secondary tasks is postponed until the primary response is selected. If this is so, then compatibility between the secondary and primary responses, or between the secondary response and the primary stimulus, should not affect primary-task performance. Yet such effects were demonstrated in 5 dual-task experiments combining primary manual and secondary vocal tasks: Pronounced effects of compatibility between the secondary and primary response and between the secondary response and primary stimulus were found on primary-task performance. The latter effect was also found with the lowest level of an extensive stimulus onset asynchrony variation, when the secondary task was not speeded, and even when the 2 tasks were performed on different trials. Findings suggest that secondary responses were activated before primary response selection was completed and thus support an automatic-translation hypothesis holding that, although eventual response selection may be serial, stimulus-response translation is performed in parallel.

Cites (45)

1. Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review.
   MacLeod, Colin M. · 1991 · Psychological Bulletin
2. Acquisition of cognitive skill
   Anderson, John R. · 1982 · Psychological Review
3. Toward an instance theory of automatization.
   Logan, Gordon D. · 1988 · Psychological Review
4. Dual-task interference in simple tasks: data and theory
   Pashler, Harold · 1994 · Psychological Bulletin
5. On the control of automatic processes: A parallel distributed processing account of the Stroop effect.
   Cohen, Jonathan D., Dunbar, Kevin, McClelland, James L. · 1990 · Psychological Review
6. Attention and performance IV
   Sylvan Kornblum · 1973 · Academic Press eBooks
7. The influence of irrelevant location information on performance: A review of the Simon and spatial Stroop effects
   Lu, Chen-hui, Proctor, Robert W. · 1995 · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
8. THE ‘PSYCHOLOGICAL REFRACTORY PERIOD’ AND THE TIMING OF HIGH‐SPEED PERFORMANCE—A REVIEW AND A THEORY
   WELFORD, A. T. · 1952 · British Journal of Psychology. General Section
9. Conditional and unconditional automaticity: a dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus–response correspondence
   De Jong, Ritske, Liang, Chia-Chin, Lauber, Erick · 1994 · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance
10. The Effects of an Irrelevant Directional CUE on Human Information Processing
    Simon, J. Richard · 1990 · Advances in Psychology

Show all 45 references

Cited by (4)

1. Empathy: its ultimate and proximate bases
   Preston, Stephanie D., de Waal, Frans B. M. · 2002 · Behavioral and Brain Sciences
2. Neural implementation of response selection in humans as revealed by localized effects of stimulus–response compatibility on brain activation
   Schumacher, Eric H., D'Esposito, Mark · 2002 · Human Brain Mapping
3. The cognitive architecture for chaining of two mental operations
   Sackur, Jérôme, Dehaene, Stanislas · 2009 · Cognition
4. Gaming to see: action video gaming is associated with enhanced processing of masked stimuli
   Pohl, Carsten, Kunde, Wilfried, Ganz, Thomas, Conzelmann, Annette, Pauli, Paul, Kiesel, Andrea · 2014 · Frontiers in Psychology

See all 353