Cited by 90Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesMotor Control and AdaptationNeurobiology of Language and Bilingualism

Neural implementation of response selection in humans as revealed by localized effects of stimulus–response compatibility on brain activation

Open access
Schumacher, Eric H., D'Esposito, Mark·2002·Human Brain Mapping

Abstract

Response selection, which involves choosing representations for appropriate motor behaviors given one's current situation, is a fundamental mental process central to a wide variety of human performance, yet the neural mechanisms underlying this mental process remain unclear. Research using nonhuman primates implicates ventral prefrontal and lateral premotor cortices in this process. In contrast, human neuroimaging research also highlights the role of dorsal prefrontal, anterior cingulate, and superior parietal cortices in response selection. This inconsistency may stem from the difficulty of isolating response selection within the constraints of cognitive subtraction methodology utilized in neuroimaging. We overcome this limitation by using an experimental procedure designed to selectively influence discrete mental processing stages and analyses that are less reliant on the assumptions of cognitive subtraction. We varied stimulus contrast to affect stimulus encoding and stimulus-response compatibility to affect response selection. Brain activation data suggest processing specific to response selection in superior parietal and dorsal prefrontal cortices, and not ventral prefrontal cortex. Anterior cingulate and lateral premotor cortices may also be involved in response selection, or these regions may mediate other response processes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hbm.10063

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The PMv and middle frontal gyrus regions observed in the present study are similar to regions observed in relation to response selection by Bunge et al. (2003) and Schumacher and D'Esposito (2002).

    “The PMv and middle frontal gyrus regions observed in the present study are similar to regions observed in relation to response selection by Bunge et al. (2003) and Schumacher and D'Esposito (2002).”

    From The Neural Correlates of Motor Skill Automaticity (2005) · cites this paper as Schumacher and D'Esposito, 2002

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Duvernoy H (1991): The human brain surface, three-dimensional sectional anatomy and MRI. New York: Springer-Verlag Wien.
  2. Fuster JM (1995): Memory in the cerebral cortex. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  3. Passingham RE (1993): The frontal lobes and voluntary action. Ox- ford: Oxford Psychology Series.
  4. Petrides M (1987): Conditional learning and the primate frontal cortex. In: Perecman E, editor. The frontal lobes revisited. New York: IRBN Press. pp 91-108.
  5. Talairach J, Tournoux P (1988): Co-planar stereotaxic atlas of the human brain. New York: Thieme.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schumacher, E. H., & D'Esposito, M.
Affiliations
University of California, Berkeley (US)
Venue
Human Brain Mapping
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-09-30
Volume
17
Issue
3
Pages
193-201
ISSN
  • 1065-9471 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0193
OpenAlex
W2087663053
Cited by
90
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 1
FWCI
5.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Human Brain Mapping (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (HM12676)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
Keywords
response selection, stimulus-response compatibility, stimulus contrast, dorsal prefrontal cortex, superior parietal cortex, anterior cingulate cortex, lateral premotor cortex, ventral prefrontal cortex, stimulus encoding
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Brain Mapping, Cerebral Cortex, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Nerve Net, Psychomotor Performance, Reaction Time

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review