Separating conscious and unconscious influences of memory: Measuring recollection.
Abstract
How can conscious and unconscious influences of memory be measured? In this article, a process-dissociation procedure (L. L. Jacoby, 1991) was used to separate automatic (unconscious) and consciously controlled influences within a task. For recall cued with word stems, automatic influences of memory (a) remained invariant across manipulations of attention that substantially reduced conscious recollection and (b) were highly dependent on perceptual similarity from study to test. Comparisons with results obtained through an indirect test show the advantages of the process-dissociation procedure as a means of measuring unconscious influences. The measure of recollection derived from this procedure is superior to measures gained from classic test theory and signal-detection theory. The process-dissociation procedure combines assumptions from these 2 traditional approaches to measuring memory. Dissociations between performance on direct and indirect tests of memory supply examples of effects of the past in the absence of remembering (for reviews, see Hintzman, 1990; Richardson-Klavehn & Bjork, 1988). In an indirect test, sub-jects are not asked to report on memory for an event as they
Cites (2)
- Implicit memory: History and current status.Schacter, Daniel L. · 1987 · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition
- Nonanalytic Cognition: Memory, Perception, and Concept LearningJacoby, Larry L., Brooks, Lee R. · 1984 · Psychology of Learning and Motivation
Cited by (28)
- The Nature of Recollection and Familiarity: A Review of 30 Years of ResearchYonelinas, Andrew P · 2002 · Journal of Memory and Language
- Monitoring one’s own knowledge during study: A cue-utilization approach to judgments of learningKoriat, Asher · 1997 · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
- The police officer's dilemma: Using ethnicity to disambiguate potentially threatening individuals.Correll, Joshua, Park, Bernadette, Judd, Charles M., Wittenbrink, Bernd · 2002 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Characteristics of dissociable human learning systemsShanks, David R., St. John, Mark F. · 1994 · Behavioral and Brain Sciences
- Cognitive impairment in preclinical Alzheimer's disease: a meta-analysisBäckman, Lars, Jones, Sari, Berger, Anna-Karin, Laukka, Erika Jonsson, Small, Brent J. · 2005 · Neuropsychology
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Separating conscious and unconscious influences of memory: Measuring recollection. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0096-3445.122.2.139
- The paper
- Jacoby, L. L., Toth, J. P., & Yonelinas, A. P. (1993). Separating conscious and unconscious influences of memory: Measuring recollection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. https://doi.org/10.1037//0096-3445.122.2.139
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.