Working memory and retrieval: A resource-dependent inhibition model.
Abstract
Four experiments examined individual differences in working memory (WM) capacity and how those differences affect performance on retrieval from both primary and secondary memory. The results showed that WM differences appear only in retrieval from primary memory and then only under conditions that lead to interference or response competition within the task. This suggests that WM capacity is important to retrieval that is based on controlled effortful search but not search that is based on automatic activation. A view is presented suggesting that individual differences in attentional resources lead to differences in the ability to inhibit or suppress irrelevant information. The paradigm also allowed more general comparisons between the processes involved in retrieval from primary and secondary memory. As expected, it was found that retrieval from primary memory was a function of set size. However, for sets larger than 2 items, retrieval from secondary memory was independent of set size.
Cites (4)
- Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending, and a general theoryShiffrin, Richard M., Schneider, Walter · 1977 · Psychological Review
- Toward an instance theory of automatization.Logan, Gordon D. · 1988 · Psychological Review
- Search of associative memoryRaaijmakers, Jeroen G., Shiffrin, Richard M. · 1981 · Psychological Review
- Individual differences in working memory and comprehension: A test of four hypotheses.Engle, Randall W., Cantor, Judy, Carullo, Julie J. · 1992 · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition
Cited by (52)
- Executive functionsDiamond, Adele · 2013 · Annual Review of Psychology
- Working memory, short-term memory, and general fluid intelligence: A latent-variable approach.Engle, Randall W., Tuholski, Stephen W., Laughlin, James E., Conway, Andrew R. A. · 1999 · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
- Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user’s guideConway, Andrew R. A., Kane, Michael J., Bunting, Michael F., Hambrick, D. Zach, Wilhelm, Oliver, Engle, Randall W. · 2005 · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
- Executive function in preschoolers: A review using an integrative framework.Garon, Nancy, Bryson, Susan E., Smith, Isabel M. · 2008 · Psychological Bulletin
- Exploring the Central ExecutiveBaddeley, Alan · 1996 · The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Working memory and retrieval: A resource-dependent inhibition model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0096-3445.123.4.354
- The paper
- Conway, A. R. A., & Engle, R. W. (1994). Working memory and retrieval: A resource-dependent inhibition model. Journal of Experimental Psychology General. https://doi.org/10.1037//0096-3445.123.4.354
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.