How many memory systems? Evidence from aging.
Abstract
The present research tested Tulving's (1985) ternary memory theory. Young (ages 19-32) and older (ages 63-80) adults were given procedural, semantic, and episodic memory tasks. Repetition, lag, and codability were manipulated in a picture-naming task, followed by incidental memory tests. Relative to young adults, older adults exhibited lower levels of recall and recognition, but these episodic measures increased similarly as a function of lag and repetition in both age groups. No age-related deficits emerged in either semantic memory (vocabulary, latency slopes, naming errors, and tip-of-the-tongue responses) or procedural memory (repetition priming magnitude and rate of decline). In addition to the age by memory task dissociations, the manipulation of codability produced slower naming latencies and more naming errors (semantic memory), yet promoted better recall and recognition (episodic memory). Finally, a factor analysis of 11 memory measures revealed three distinct factors, providing additional support for a tripartite memory model.
Cites (5)
- Experimental Design: Procedures for the Behavioral SciencesKirk, Roger · 2013
- Implicit memory: History and current status.Schacter, Daniel L. · 1987 · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition
- How many memory systems are there?Tulving, Endel · 1985 · American Psychologist
- Précis of Elements of episodic memoryTulving, Endel · 1984 · Behavioral and Brain Sciences
- Nonanalytic Cognition: Memory, Perception, and Concept LearningJacoby, Larry L., Brooks, Lee R. · 1984 · Psychology of Learning and Motivation
Cited by (11)
- Normal aging and prospective memory.Einstein, Gilles O., McDaniel, Mark A. · 1990 · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition
- Stability, growth, and decline in adult life span development of declarative memory: Cross-sectional and longitudinal data from a population-based studyRönnlund, Michael, Nyberg, Lars, Bäckman, Lars, Nilsson, Lars-Göran · 2005 · Psychology and Aging
- A review of the tip-of-the-tongue experienceBrown, Alan S. · 1991 · Psychological Bulletin
- The frontal aging hypothesis evaluated.GREENWOOD, PAMELA M. · 2000 · Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society
- Age-related effects on speech production: A reviewMortensen, Linda, Meyer, Antje S., Humphreys, Glyn W. · 2006 · Language and Cognitive Processes
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: How many memory systems? Evidence from aging. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0278-7393.15.1.31
- The paper
- Mitchell, D. B. (1989). How many memory systems? Evidence from aging. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. https://doi.org/10.1037//0278-7393.15.1.31
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.