Learning artificial grammars with competitive chunking.

Servan-Schreiber, Emile, Anderson, John R.·1990·Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition

Abstract

When exposed to a regular stimulus field, for instance, that generated by an artificial grammar, subjects unintentionally learn to respond efficiently to the underlying structure (Miller, 1958; Reber 1967). We explored the hypothesis that the learning process is chunking and that grammatical knowledge is implicitly encoded in a hierarchical network of chunks. We trained subjects on exemplar sentences while inducing them to form specific chunks. Their knowledge was then assessed through judgments ofgrammaticality. We found that subjects were less sensitive to violations that preserved their chunks than to violations that did not. We derived the theory of competitive chunking (CC) and found that it successfully reproduces, via computer simula-tions, both Miller's experimental results and our own. In CC, chunks are hierarchical structures strengthened with use by a bottom-up perception process. Strength-mediated competitions determine which chunks are created and which are used by the perception process. The world is regular, and people are efficient regularity detectors. Sometimes people are intentionally looking for structural regularities. Other times, however, people learn to respond to structured stimuli even though they do not suspect

Cites (3)

  1. Subjective organization in free recall of "unrelated" words.
    Tulving, Endel · 1962 · Psychological Review
  2. Nonanalytic Cognition: Memory, Perception, and Concept Learning
    Jacoby, Larry L., Brooks, Lee R. · 1984 · Psychology of Learning and Motivation
  3. On the relationship between implicit and explicit modes in the learning of a complex rule structure.
    Reber, Arthur S., Kassin, Saul M., Lewis, Selma, Cantor, Gary · 1980 · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory

Show all 3 references

Cited by (15)

  1. Characteristics of dissociable human learning systems
    Shanks, David R., St. John, Mark F. · 1994 · Behavioral and Brain Sciences
  2. The Structure and Organization of Memory
    Squire, L. R., Knowlton, B., Musen, G. · 1993 · Annual Review of Psychology
  3. Sequencing in SLA: Phonological Memory, Chunking, and Points of Order
    Ellis, Nick C. · 1996 · Studies in Second Language Acquisition
  4. Awareness and Second Language Acquisition
    Schmidt, Richard · 1992 · Annual Review of Applied Linguistics
  5. The Knowledge‐Learning‐Instruction Framework: Bridging the Science‐Practice Chasm to Enhance Robust Student Learning
    Koedinger, Kenneth R., Corbett, Albert T., Perfetti, Charles · 2012 · Cognitive Science

See all 400

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Learning artificial grammars with competitive chunking. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0278-7393.16.4.592
The paper
Servan-Schreiber, E., & Anderson, J. R. (1990). Learning artificial grammars with competitive chunking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. https://doi.org/10.1037//0278-7393.16.4.592

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.