Take the best or look at the rest? Factors influencing "one-reason" decision making.
Abstract
Aspects of an experimental environment were manipulated in 3 experiments to examine the parameters under which the "take-the-best" (TTB) heuristic (e.g., G. Gigerenzer & D. G. Goldstein, 1996) operates. Results indicated TTB use to be more prevalent when the cost of information was high, when validities of the cues were known, and when a deterministic environment was used. However, large individual variability in strategy use was observed as well as a significant proportion of behavior inconsistent with TTB, expecially its stopping rule. The results demarcate some of the heuristic's boundary conditions and also question the validity of TTB as a psychologically plausible and pervasive model of behavior.
Cites (33)
- Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral SciencesGuitton, Henri, Siegel, S. · 1958 · Revue économique
- “Neural” computation of decisions in optimization problemsHopfield, J. J., Tank, D. W. · 1985 · Biological Cybernetics
- Rational choice and the structure of the environment.Simon, H. A. · 1956 · Psychological Review
- Vision: A Computational Investigation into the Human Representation and Processing of Visual InformationDavid Marr · 1982 · Cumulative Index of Computer Aided Architectural Design
- Simple Heuristics That Make Us SmartGerd Gigerenzer, Peter Martin Todd · 1999
- Reasoning the fast and frugal way: Models of bounded rationality.Gigerenzer, Gerd, Goldstein, Daniel G. · 1996 · Psychological Review
- Elimination by aspects: A theory of choiceTversky, Amos · 1972 · Psychological Review
- The Adaptive Character of ThoughtMassaro, Dominic W., Friedman, Daniel, Anderson, John R. · 1991 · The American Journal of Psychology
- Task complexity and contingent processing in decision making: An information search and protocol analysisPayne, John W. · 1976 · Organizational Behavior and Human Performance
- Adaptive strategy selection in decision making.Payne, John W., Bettman, James R., Johnson, Eric J. · 1988 · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition
Cited by (13)
- Heuristic decision makingGigerenzer, Gerd, Gaissmaier, Wolfgang · 2011 · Annual Review of Psychology
- Homo Heuristicus: Why Biased Minds Make Better InferencesGigerenzer, Gerd, Brighton, Henry · 2009 · Topics in Cognitive Science
- Fast and Frugal Heuristics: The Tools of Bounded RationalityGigerenzer, Gerd · 2004 · Blackwell Handbook of Judgment and Decision Making
- Strategies for revising judgment: How (and how well) people use others’ opinions.Soll, Jack B., Larrick, Richard P. · 2009 · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition
- Meta-Reasoning: Monitoring and Control of Thinking and ReasoningAckerman, Rakefet, Thompson, Valerie A. · 2017 · Trends in Cognitive Sciences
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Take the best or look at the rest? Factors influencing "one-reason" decision making. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0278-7393.29.1.53
- The paper
- Newell, B. R., & Shanks, D. R. (2003). Take the best or look at the rest? Factors influencing "one-reason" decision making. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition. https://doi.org/10.1037//0278-7393.29.1.53
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.