Take the best or look at the rest? Factors influencing "one-reason" decision making.

Newell, Ben R., Shanks, David R.·2003·Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition

Abstract

Aspects of an experimental environment were manipulated in 3 experiments to examine the parameters under which the "take-the-best" (TTB) heuristic (e.g., G. Gigerenzer & D. G. Goldstein, 1996) operates. Results indicated TTB use to be more prevalent when the cost of information was high, when validities of the cues were known, and when a deterministic environment was used. However, large individual variability in strategy use was observed as well as a significant proportion of behavior inconsistent with TTB, expecially its stopping rule. The results demarcate some of the heuristic's boundary conditions and also question the validity of TTB as a psychologically plausible and pervasive model of behavior.

Cites (33)

  1. Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences
    Guitton, Henri, Siegel, S. · 1958 · Revue économique
  2. “Neural” computation of decisions in optimization problems
    Hopfield, J. J., Tank, D. W. · 1985 · Biological Cybernetics
  3. Rational choice and the structure of the environment.
    Simon, H. A. · 1956 · Psychological Review
  4. Vision: A Computational Investigation into the Human Representation and Processing of Visual Information
    David Marr · 1982 · Cumulative Index of Computer Aided Architectural Design
  5. Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart
    Gerd Gigerenzer, Peter Martin Todd · 1999
  6. Reasoning the fast and frugal way: Models of bounded rationality.
    Gigerenzer, Gerd, Goldstein, Daniel G. · 1996 · Psychological Review
  7. Elimination by aspects: A theory of choice
    Tversky, Amos · 1972 · Psychological Review
  8. The Adaptive Character of Thought
    Massaro, Dominic W., Friedman, Daniel, Anderson, John R. · 1991 · The American Journal of Psychology
  9. Task complexity and contingent processing in decision making: An information search and protocol analysis
    Payne, John W. · 1976 · Organizational Behavior and Human Performance
  10. Adaptive strategy selection in decision making.
    Payne, John W., Bettman, James R., Johnson, Eric J. · 1988 · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition

Show all 33 references

Cited by (13)

  1. Heuristic decision making
    Gigerenzer, Gerd, Gaissmaier, Wolfgang · 2011 · Annual Review of Psychology
  2. Homo Heuristicus: Why Biased Minds Make Better Inferences
    Gigerenzer, Gerd, Brighton, Henry · 2009 · Topics in Cognitive Science
  3. Fast and Frugal Heuristics: The Tools of Bounded Rationality
    Gigerenzer, Gerd · 2004 · Blackwell Handbook of Judgment and Decision Making
  4. Strategies for revising judgment: How (and how well) people use others’ opinions.
    Soll, Jack B., Larrick, Richard P. · 2009 · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition
  5. Meta-Reasoning: Monitoring and Control of Thinking and Reasoning
    Ackerman, Rakefet, Thompson, Valerie A. · 2017 · Trends in Cognitive Sciences

See all 286

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Take the best or look at the rest? Factors influencing "one-reason" decision making. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0278-7393.29.1.53
The paper
Newell, B. R., & Shanks, D. R. (2003). Take the best or look at the rest? Factors influencing "one-reason" decision making. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition. https://doi.org/10.1037//0278-7393.29.1.53

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.