The place of attachment in human mating.
Abstract
Application of the principles of evolution and natural selection to the phenomena of human mating does not lead inevitably to a single theoretical model. According to the standard evolutionary model, formally known as sexual strategies theory (D. M. Buss & D. P. Schmitt, 1993), biologically based sex differences in parental investment have resulted in hard-wired sex differences in mate preferences and mating strategies. A critical analysis of the logical and empirical foundations of the theory reveals several weaknesses and limitations. This article demonstrates how attachment theory (J. Bowlby, 1969/1982, 1973, 1979, 1980, 1988) can be used to integrate a diverse set of ideas and research findings and provide a more grounded account of human mating.
Cites (7)
- Attachment and Loss. Vol. 1. AttachmentRever, George W. · 1972 · Psychosomatic Medicine
- Exaptation—a missing term in the science of formGould, Stephen Jay, Vrba, Elisabeth S. · 1982 · Paleobiology
- Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 culturesBuss, David M. · 1989 · Behavioral and Brain Sciences
- Sexual strategies theory: an evolutionary perspective on human matingBuss, David M., Schmitt, David P. · 1993 · Psychological Review
- Neuroendocrine perspectives on social attachment and loveSue Carter, C · 1998 · Psychoneuroendocrinology
- Sex Differences in Jealousy: Evolution, Physiology, and PsychologyBuss, David M., Larsen, Randy J., Westen, Drew, Semmelroth, Jennifer · 1992 · Psychological Science
- COPULATORY COURTSHIP AND CRYPTIC FEMALE CHOICE IN INSECTSEBERHARD, WILLIAM G. · 1991 · Biological Reviews
Cited by (11)
- Adult romantic attachment: Theoretical developments, emerging controversies, and unanswered questionsFraley, R. Chris, Shaver, Phillip R. · 2000 · Review of General Psychology
- Sociosexuality from Argentina to Zimbabwe: A 48-nation study of sex, culture, and strategies of human matingSchmitt, David P. · 2005 · Behavioral and Brain Sciences
- Sex similarities and differences in preferences for short-term mates: What, whether, and why.Li, Norman P., Kenrick, Douglas T. · 2006 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Coregulation, Dysregulation, Self-Regulation: An Integrative Analysis and Empirical Agenda for Understanding Adult Attachment, Separation, Loss, and RecoverySbarra, David A., Hazan, Cindy · 2008 · Personality and Social Psychology Review
- Romantic love: a mammalian brain system for mate choiceFisher, Helen E, Aron, Arthur, Brown, Lucy L · 2006 · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The place of attachment in human mating. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//1089-2680.4.2.186
- The paper
- Hazan, C., & Diamond, L. M. (2000). The place of attachment in human mating. Review of General Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037//1089-2680.4.2.186
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.