Cited by 427Attachment and Relationship DynamicsPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology ResearchDeath Anxiety and Social Exclusion

Coregulation, Dysregulation, Self-Regulation: An Integrative Analysis and Empirical Agenda for Understanding Adult Attachment, Separation, Loss, and Recovery

Sbarra, David A., Hazan, Cindy·2008·Personality and Social Psychology Review

Abstract

An integrative framework is proposed for understanding how multiple biological and psychological systems are regulated in the context of adult attachment relationships, dysregulated by separation and loss experiences, and, potentially, re-regulated through individual recovery efforts. Evidence is reviewed for a coregulatory model of normative attachment, defined as a pattern of interwoven physiology between romantic partners that results from the conditioning of biological reward systems and the emergence of felt security within adult pair bonds. The loss of coregulation can portend a state of biobehavioral dysregulation, ranging from diffuse psychophysiological arousal and disorganization to a full-blown (and highly organized) stress response. The major task for successful recovery is adopting a self-regulatory strategy that attenuates the dysregulating effects of the attachment disruption. Research evidence is reviewed across multiple levels of analysis, and the article concludes with a series of testable research questions on the interconnected nature of attachment, loss, and recovery processes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1088868308315702

Cites

229 of 229 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Throughout the lifespan, physiologic linkages between partners are thought to provide a foundation for connections between individuals who can aid in basic needs.

    “Throughout the lifespan, physiologic linkages between partners are thought to provide a foundation for connections between individuals who can aid in basic needs (Sbarra and Hazan, 2008).”

    From Physiological feelings (2019) · cites this paper as Sbarra and Hazan, 2008

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sbarra, D. A., & Hazan, C.
Affiliations
  • University of Arizona (US)
  • Cornell University (US)
Venue
Personality and Social Psychology Review
Published
2008-05
Volume
12
Issue
2
Pages
141-167
ISSN
  • 1088-8683 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-7957
OpenAlex
W2113867612
Cited by
427
References
229
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 20
FWCI
1.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Personality and Social Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R03MH074637)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
Keywords
adult attachment, co-regulation, self-regulation, separation and loss, romantic relationships, pair bond, stress response, sense of security, attachment disruption
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Age Factors, Animals, Arousal, Bereavement, Emotions, Humans, Individuality, Interpersonal Relations, Life Change Events, Marriage, Models, Biological, Models, Psychological, Object Attachment, Pair Bond, Psychoanalytic Theory, Social Control, Informal, Stress, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review