Vertical versus shared leadership as predictors of the effectiveness of change management teams: An examination of aversive, directive, transactional, transformational, and empowering leader behaviors.
Abstract
This study investigated vertical versus shared leadership as predictors of the effective-ness of 71 change management teams. Vertical leadership stems from an appointed or formal leader of a team, whereas shared leadership (C. L. Pearce, 1997; C. L. Pearce & J. A. Conger, in press; C. L. Pearce & H. P. Sims, 2000) is a group process in which leadership is distributed among, and stems from, team members. Team effectiveness was measured approximately 6 months after the assessment of leadership and was also measured from the viewpoints of managers, internal customers, and team members. Using multiple regression, the authors found both vertical and shared leadership to be significantly related to team effectiveness ( p .05), although shared leadership appears to be a more useful predictor of team effectiveness than vertical leadership. The increasing use of empowered teams and concomitant flattening of organizational struc-tures (Mohrman, Cohen, & Mohrman, 1995) brings into question the more traditional models of leadership. What kind of leadership is more
Cites (5)
- Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of TestsCronbach, Lee J. · 1951 · Psychometrika
- Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response biasJames, Lawrence R., Demaree, Robert G., Wolf, Gerrit · 1984 · Journal of Applied Psychology
- Animal intelligence; experimental studiesThorndike, Edward L. · 1911
- A disagreement about within-group agreement: disentangling issues of consistency versus consensusKozlowski, Steve W., Hattrup, Keith · 1992 · Journal of Applied Psychology
- Beyond fiasco: a reappraisal of the groupthink phenomenon and a new model of group decision processesAldag, Ramon J., Fuller, Sally R. · 1993 · Psychological Bulletin
Cited by (33)
- Leadership: Current Theories, Research, and Future DirectionsAvolio, Bruce J., Walumbwa, Fred O., Weber, Todd J. · 2009 · Annual Review of Psychology
- Servant Leadership: A Review and Synthesisvan Dierendonck, Dirk · 2011 · Journal of Management
- Transformational leadership and performance across criteria and levels: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of researchGang Wang, Oh, In-Sue, Courtright, Stephen H., Colbert, Amy E. · 2011 · Group & Organization Management
- Key questions regarding work engagement.Bakker, Arnold B., Albrecht, Simon L., Leiter, Michael P. · 2011 · European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology
- Leadership in teams: A functional approach to understanding leadership structures and processesMorgeson, Frederick P., DeRue, D. Scott, Karam, Elizabeth P. · 2010 · Journal of Management
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Vertical versus shared leadership as predictors of the effectiveness of change management teams: An examination of aversive, directive, transactional, transformational, and empowering leader behaviors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//1089-2699.6.2.172
- The paper
- Pearce, C. L., & Jr. Sims Henry, P. (2002). Vertical versus shared leadership as predictors of the effectiveness of change management teams: An examination of aversive, directive, transactional, transformational, and empowering leader behaviors. Group Dynamics Theory Research and Practice. https://doi.org/10.1037//1089-2699.6.2.172
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.