Cited by 3,000Leadership and Management in OrganizationsJob Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorEmployee Performance and Leadership

Leadership: Current Theories, Research, and Future Directions

Avolio, Bruce J., Walumbwa, Fred O., Weber, Todd J.·2009·Annual Review of Psychology

Abstract

This review examines recent theoretical and empirical developments in the leadership literature, beginning with topics that are currently receiving attention in terms of research, theory, and practice. We begin by examining authentic leadership and its development, followed by work that takes a cognitive science approach. We then examine new-genre leadership theories, complexity leadership, and leadership that is shared, collective, or distributed. We examine the role of relationships through our review of leader member exchange and the emerging work on followership. Finally, we examine work that has been done on substitutes for leadership, servant leadership, spirituality and leadership, cross-cultural leadership, and e-leadership. This structure has the benefit of creating a future focus as well as providing an interesting way to examine the development of the field. Each section ends with an identification of issues to be addressed in the future, in addition to the overall integration of the literature we provide at the end of the article.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163621

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Avolio, B. J., Walumbwa, F. O., & Weber, T. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Nebraska–Lincoln (US)
  • Arizona State University (US)
Venue
Annual Review of Psychology
Published
2009-01-01
Volume
60
Issue
1
Pages
421-449
ISSN
  • 0066-4308 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-2085
OpenAlex
W2150790720
Cited by
3,000
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 131 · 2025: 183 · 2024: 227 · 2023: 205 · 2022: 212 · 2021: 213 · 2020: 201 · 2019: 187 · 2018: 211 · 2017: 225 · 2016: 178 · 2015: 181 · 2014: 186 · 2013: 174 · 2012: 124
FWCI
36.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annual Review of Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ScholarWorks (Central Washington University) (submittedVersion)
  • Lincoln (University of Nebraska) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Leadership and Management in Organizations
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Employee Performance and Leadership
Keywords
leadership, authentic leadership, leadership development, complexity leadership, distributed leadership, shared leadership, leader-member exchange, followership, substitutes for leadership, servant leadership, cross-cultural leadership, digital leadership
MeSH terms
Cross-Cultural Comparison, Forecasting, Goals, Humans, International Cooperation, Leadership, Psychological Theory, Research, Social Conformity, Social Identification, User-Computer Interface, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review