Cited by 121Psychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsAttachment and Relationship DynamicsPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

Attachment representations of institutionalized adolescents and their professional caregivers: Predicting the development of therapeutic relationships

Open access
Zegers, Monique A. M., Schuengel, Carlo, van IJzendoorn, Marinus H., Janssens, Jan M. A. M.·2006·American Journal of Orthopsychiatry

Abstract

This study prospectively examined the effects of adolescent (N=81) and professional caregiver (N=33) attachment representations, measured using the Adult Attachment Interview, on therapeutic relationships in a youth treatment institution. After the first 3 months of the clients' stay in the institution, no effects of adolescents' or mentors' (i.e., the professional caregiver assigned) security and type of attachment representations were found. In a subgroup of 28 clients staying for a longer period, more secure adolescents were perceived by their mentors as increasing their secure base use and decreasing avoidance of contact, whereas more secure mentors were increasingly perceived as available as a secure base. Moreover, specific combinations of attachment representations of mentor and adolescent had different effects on adolescent hostility.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0002-9432.76.3.325

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zegers, M. A. M., Schuengel, C., van IJzendoorn, M. H., & Janssens, J. M. A. M.
Affiliations
  • Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
  • Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
Venue
American Journal of Orthopsychiatry
Published
2006-07
Volume
76
Issue
3
Pages
325-334
ISSN
  • 0002-9432 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-0025
OpenAlex
W2077654168
Cited by
121
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 10
FWCI
7.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • American Journal of Orthopsychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Digital Academic REpository of VU University Amsterdam (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Dutch Government
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
attachment representations, institutionalized adolescents, therapeutic relationship, professional caregivers, contact avoidance, secure attachment, Adult Attachment Interview
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Affective Symptoms, Mental Disorders, Child Behavior Disorders, Defense Mechanisms, Female, Hostility, Humans, Juvenile Delinquency, Male, Mentors, Milieu Therapy, Object Attachment, Professional-Patient Relations, Prognosis, Psychotherapy, Residential Treatment, Caregivers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review