The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Controlling other people: The impact of power on stereotyping.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., Glick, P., & Xu, J. (2002) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.878 · Cited by 7,364
Self-citationJost, J. T., Banaji, M. R., & Nosek, B. A. (2004) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00402.x · Cited by 2,883
Is the desire for status a fundamental human motive? A review of the empirical literature.
Anderson, C., Hildreth, J. A. D., & Howland, L. (2015) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0038781 · Cited by 1,133
Owens, B. P., & Hekman, D. R. (2012) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2010.0441 · Cited by 778
Emotional convergence between people over time.
Anderson, C., Keltner, D., & John, O. P. (2003) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.84.5.1054 · Cited by 676
Stewart, A. J., & McDermott, C. (2004) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.141537 · Cited by 450
Minds made for sharing: initiating joint attention recruits reward-related neurocircuitry
Schilbach, L., Wilms, M., Eickhoff, S. B., Romanzetti, S., Tepest, R., Bente, G., Shah, N. J., Fink, G. R., & Vogeley, K. (2010) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.2009.21401 · Cited by 415
Understanding and influencing the stigma of mental illness
Corrigan, P. W., & Wassel, A. (2008) · Journal of Psychosocial Nursing and Mental Health Services · doi:10.3928/02793695-20080101-04 · Cited by 288
van der Toorn, J., Feinberg, M., Jost, J. T., Kay, A. C., Tyler, T. R., Willer, R., & Wilmuth, C. (2015) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12183 · Cited by 259
“I think it, therefore it’s true”: Effects of self-perceived objectivity on hiring discrimination
Uhlmann, E. L., & Cohen, G. L. (2007) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2007.07.001 · Cited by 232
The Uncertainty Paradox: Perceived Threat Moderates the Effect of Uncertainty on Political Tolerance
Haas, I. J., & Cunningham, W. A. (2014) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12035 · Cited by 96
Qin, X., Liu, X., Brown, J. A., Zheng, X., & Owens, B. P. (2021) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-019-04250-4 · Cited by 64
On sanction-goal justifications: How and why deterrence justifications undermine rule compliance.
Mooijman, M., van Dijk, W. W., van Dijk, E., & Ellemers, N. (2017) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspi0000084 · Cited by 36
Welsh, D. T., Mai, K. M., Ellis, A. P. J., & Christian, M. S. (2018) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2018.01.007 · Cited by 26
Powerlessness Also Corrupts: Lower Power Increases Self-Promotional Lying
Li, H. (., Chen, Y.-R., & Hildreth, J. A. D. (2023) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2022.1630 · Cited by 12
Fiske, S. T. (2009) · Handbook of Neuroscience for the Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1002/9780470478509.neubb002051 · Cited by 11
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Fiske, S. T.
- Venue
- American Psychologist
- Published
- 1993
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 621-628
- ISSN
- 0003-066X (ISSN-L)
- 1935-990X
- OpenAlex
- W4296586302
- Cited by
- 1,585
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 73.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.