Cited by 96Social and Intergroup PsychologyElectoral Systems and Political ParticipationDeath Anxiety and Social Exclusion

The Uncertainty Paradox: Perceived Threat Moderates the Effect of Uncertainty on Political Tolerance

Haas, Ingrid Johnsen, Cunningham, William A.·2014·Political Psychology

Abstract

People respond to dissimilar political beliefs in a variety of ways, ranging from openness and acceptance to closed‐mindedness and intolerance. While there is reason to believe that uncertainty may influence political tolerance, the direction of this influence remains unclear. We propose that threat moderates the effect of uncertainty on tolerance; when safe, uncertainty leads to greater tolerance, yet when threatened, uncertainty leads to reduced tolerance. Using independent manipulations of threat and uncertainty, we provide support for this hypothesis. This research demonstrates that, although feelings of threat and uncertainty can be independent, it is also important to understand their interaction.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/pops.12035

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Individuals with a lower threshold for tolerating uncertainty tend to be more rigid and closed-minded in their worldviews, values, and attitudes, especially when uncertainty is explicitly linked with threat.

    “Individuals with a lower threshold for tolerating uncertainty tend to be more rigid and closed-minded in their worldviews, values, and attitudes [45,153], especially when uncertainty is explicitly linked with threat [154,155].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 62 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Haas, I. J., & Cunningham, W. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Nebraska–Lincoln (US)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
Venue
Political Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-06-12
Volume
35
Issue
2
Pages
291-302
ISSN
  • 0162-895X (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9221
OpenAlex
W2147442708
Cited by
96
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 6 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2
FWCI
9.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Political Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
Keywords
political tolerance, uncertainty, threat perception, political beliefs, intolerance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review