Cited by 36Psychology of Social InfluenceExperimental Behavioral Economics StudiesSocial Power and Status Dynamics

On sanction-goal justifications: How and why deterrence justifications undermine rule compliance.

Open access
Mooijman, Marlon, van Dijk, Wilco W., van Dijk, Eric, Ellemers, Naomi·2017·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Abstract

Authorities frequently justify their sanctions as attempts to deter people from rule breaking. Although providing a sanction justification seems appealing and harmless, we propose that a deterrence justification decreases the extent to which sanctions are effective in promoting rule compliance. We develop a theoretical model that specifies how and why this occurs. Consistent with our model, 5 experiments demonstrated that-compared with sanctions provided without a justification or sanctions provided with a just-deserts justification-sanction effectiveness decreased when sanctions were justified as attempts to deter people from rule breaking. This effect was mediated by people feeling distrusted by the authority. We further demonstrated that (a) the degree to which deterrence fostered distrust was attenuated when the sanction was targeted at others (instead of the participant) and (b) the degree to which distrust undermined rule compliance was attenuated when the authority was perceived as legitimate. We discuss the practical implications for authorities tasked with promoting rule compliance, and the theoretical implications for the literature on sanctions, distrust, and rule compliance. (PsycINFO Database Record

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/pspi0000084

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mooijman, M., van Dijk, W. W., van Dijk, E., & Ellemers, N.
Affiliations
  • University of Southern California (US)
  • Utrecht University (NL)
Corresponding author
Mooijman, Marlon
Venue
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Published
2017-04
Volume
112
Issue
4
Pages
577-588
ISSN
  • 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1315
OpenAlex
W2558157296
Cited by
36
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2
FWCI
10.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Psychology of Social Influence
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
Keywords
deterrence, rule compliance, sanctions, distrust, perceived legitimacy, sanctions effectiveness
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Female, Goals, Humans, Deception, Male, Middle Aged, Motivation, Punishment, Social Behavior, Trust, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review