Cited by 2,438Education, Achievement, and GiftednessCognitive Abilities and TestingEarly Childhood Education and Development

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The development of competence in favorable and unfavorable environments: Lessons from research on successful children.

Masten, Ann S., Coatsworth, J. Douglas·1998·American Psychologist

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0003-066x.53.2.205

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 2,438

Metadata

Authors
Masten, A. S., & Coatsworth, J. D.
Venue
American Psychologist
Published
1998-02
Volume
53
Issue
2
Pages
205-220
ISSN
  • 0003-066X (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-990X
OpenAlex
W4294855960
Cited by
2,438
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 44 · 2025: 65 · 2024: 66 · 2023: 80 · 2022: 83 · 2021: 94 · 2020: 88 · 2019: 110 · 2018: 96 · 2017: 114 · 2016: 96 · 2015: 120 · 2014: 117 · 2013: 103 · 2012: 118
FWCI
67.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
American Psychologist (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Education › Early Childhood Education and Development
Keywords
competence development, child development, environmental influences on development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review