Cited by 214Criminal Justice and PenologyIntimate Partner and Family ViolenceSexual Assault and Victimization Studies

Blame, shame, and community: justice responses to violence against women

Koss, Mary P.·2000·American Psychologist

Abstract

Justice processing for crimes against women is reviewed. The data reveal conviction rates for partner violence and rape by known acquaintances are miniscule; mandatory arrest, protection orders, and diversion programs inadequately deter rebattering; few losses are compensated; and the adversarial justice process is retraumatizing, exacerbating survivor's self-blame. To better address crimes against women, several nations and tribal communities use communitarian approaches, forms of restorative justice. The offense is framed to include the perpetrator, victim, and community. The process forgoes incarceration to have family, peers, and advocates design perpetrator rehabilitation, victim restoration, and social reintegration of both victim and perpetrator. Evaluations suggest communitarian justice may increase victim satisfaction, raise the social costs of offending, multiply social control and support resources, and open a new avenue to targeted prevention.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0003-066x.55.11.1332

Cites

75 of 75 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Shame is experienced in the wake of many traumas, particularly sexual ones.

    “Indeed, shame is experienced in the wake of many traumas, particularly sexual ones (Koss, 2000; Scarce, 2001; Deblinger and Runyon, 2005; Ahrens, 2006; Karan et al., 2014).”

    From Is Shame Hallucinogenic? (2017) · cites this paper as Koss, 2000

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 77 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Koss, M. P.
Affiliations
University of Arizona (US)
Corresponding author
Koss, Mary P.
Venue
American Psychologist
Published
2000-11
Volume
55
Issue
11
Pages
1332-1343
ISSN
  • 0003-066X (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-990X
OpenAlex
W2065671975
Cited by
213
References
77
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 12
FWCI
95.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Psychologist (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
Keywords
violence against women, restorative justice, intimate partner violence, rape, conviction rates, mandatory arrest, protection orders, diversion programs, retraumatization, self-blame, victim compensation, offender rehabilitation, victim satisfaction, social reintegration, crime prevention
MeSH terms
Female, Guilt, Humans, Rape, Shame, Social Justice, Spouse Abuse, United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review