The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Promoting more integrative strategies for leadership theory-building.
Abstract
The agenda for theory and research in the field of leadership studies has evolved over the last 100 years from focuses on the internal dispositions associated with effective leaders to broader inquiries that include emphases on the cognitions, attributes, behaviors, and contexts in which leaders and followers are dynamically embedded and interact over time. Leadership theory and research has reached a point in its development at which it needs to move to the next level of integration--considering the dynamic interplay between leaders and followers, taking into account the prior, current, and emerging context--for continued progress to be made in advancing both the science and practice of leadership.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation.
Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.98.2.224 · Cited by 21,995
A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality.
Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.95.2.256 · Cited by 9,745
Toward a cognitive social learning reconceptualization of personality
Mischel, W. (1973) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0035002 · Cited by 3,181 · cited 1×
“Building off of the work of Mischel (1973), Waldman et al. (2004) discussed how uncertain or weak contexts may make employees more receptive to change, which characterizes charismatic leadership.”
BackgroundCan you see the real me? A self-based model of authentic leader and follower development
Gardner, W. L., Avolio, B. J., Luthans, F., May, D. R., & Walumbwa, F. (2005) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.03.003 · Cited by 2,232
Self-citationDay, D. V. (2000) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/s1048-9843(00)00061-8 · Cited by 2,180
Five-factor model of personality and job satisfaction: A meta-analysis.
Judge, T. A., Heller, D., & Mount, M. K. (2002) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.87.3.530 · Cited by 2,164
Kark, R., & Van Dijk, D. (2007) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2007.24351846 · Cited by 818
The determinants of leadership role occupancy: Genetic and personality factors
Arvey, R. D., Rotundo, M., Johnson, W., Zhang, Z., & McGue, M. (2006) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.10.009 · Cited by 302
Cited by
Leadership: Current Theories, Research, and Future Directions
Avolio, B. J., Walumbwa, F. O., & Weber, T. J. (2009) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163621 · Cited by 3,000
Self-citationDinh, J. E., Lord, R. G., Gardner, W. L., Meuser, J. D., Liden, R. C., & Hu, J. (2014) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.11.005 · Cited by 1,426
“For example, by shaping organizational climates and cultures, leaders can create ethical norms that guide the moral (or immoral) behavior of groups or collectives in a top-down direction (Mayer, Kuenzi, Greenbaum, Bardes, & Salvador, 2009; Schaubroeck, Hannah, Avolio, Kozlowski, Lord, et al., 2012). Simultaneously, le…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialDERUE, D. S., NAHRGANG, J. D., WELLMAN, N., & HUMPHREY, S. E. (2011) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2010.01201.x · Cited by 1,356
A meta-analysis of shared leadership and team effectiveness
Wang, D., Waldman, D. A., & Zhang, Z. (2014) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0034531 · Cited by 731
A meta-analytic review of authentic and transformational leadership: A test for redundancy
Banks, G. C., McCauley, K. D., Gardner, W. L., & Guler, C. E. (2016) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2016.02.006 · Cited by 681
Metadata
- Authors
- Avolio, B. J.
- Venue
- American Psychologist
- Published
- 2007
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 25-33
- ISSN
- 0003-066X (ISSN-L)
- 1935-990X
- OpenAlex
- W2046293325
- Cited by
- 801
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 68.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
