Cited by 818Job Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorLeadership and Management in OrganizationsBehavioral Health and Interventions

Motivation to Lead, Motivation to Follow: The Role of the Self-Regulatory Focus in Leadership Processes

Kark, Ronit, Van Dijk, Dina·2007·Academy of Management Review

Abstract

In this paper we integrate recent theories of motivation and leadership. Drawing on the self-regulatory focus theory and on self-concept based theories of leadership, we develop a conceptual framework proposing that leaders' chronic self-regulatory focus (promotion versus prevention), in conjunction with their values, influences their motivation to lead and, subsequently, their leadership behavior. We further suggest that leaders may influence the motivational self-regulatory foci of their followers, which will mediate different follower outcomes at the individual and group level.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5465/amr.2007.24351846

Cites

130 of 130 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Transformational leaders are traditionally considered as energizing because they inspire others and change the way people work toward a common goal.

    “Transformational leaders are traditionally considered as energizing: the idea is that transformational leaders are able to inspire others and change the way people work toward a common goal (cf. Bass 1985; Kark and Van Dijk 2007; Yukl 1998).”

    From Energy Management of People in Organizations: A Review and Research Agenda (2011) · cites this paper as Kark and Van Dijk 2007

  • Transformational leaders may be better able to energize followers into action toward a common goal.

    “and hence transformational leaders may be better able to energize followers into action toward a common goal (Kark and Van Dijk 2007).”

    From Energy Management of People in Organizations: A Review and Research Agenda (2011) · cites this paper as Kark and Van Dijk 2007

  • Transformational leadership style may be related to a promotion focus, while transactional leadership style may be more related to a prevention focus.

    “A transformational leadership style may very well be related to a promotion focus, while a transactional leadership style may be more related to a prevention focus”

    From Energy Management of People in Organizations: A Review and Research Agenda (2011) · cites this paper as Kark and Van Dijk 2007

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kark, R., & Van Dijk, D.
Affiliations
  • Ben-Gurion University of the Negev (IL)
  • Ben-Gurion University of the Negev
Venue
Academy of Management Review
Published
2007-04
Volume
32
Issue
2
Pages
500-528
ISSN
  • 0363-7425 (ISSN-L)
  • 1930-3807
OpenAlex
W2168708979
Cited by
818
References
130
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 47 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 45 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 54 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 53 · 2017: 50 · 2016: 56 · 2015: 47 · 2014: 52 · 2013: 55 · 2012: 41
FWCI
60.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Academy of Management Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Leadership and Management in Organizations
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
Keywords
self-regulatory focus, promotion focus, prevention focus, motivation to lead, leadership behavior, self-concept, leader values, follower motivation, follower outcomes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review