Cited by 218Career Development and DiversityEducation, Achievement, and GiftednessScience Education and Perceptions

Utility-value intervention with parents increases students’ STEM preparation and career pursuit

Open access
Rozek, Christopher S., Svoboda, Ryan C., Harackiewicz, Judith M., Hulleman, Chris S., Hyde, Janet S.·2017·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Significance: The need for students trained in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) jobs is growing rapidly in the United States, yet students do not enroll in the necessary courses to prepare for STEM careers. In a randomized controlled trial, parents in the utility–value intervention group received materials detailing the importance of STEM for their adolescents in high school. The intervention increased mathematics and science ACT scores and course-taking in high school. This greater high-school STEM preparation was associated, 5 y later, with increased STEM career pursuit. These findings suggest that educational policies should promote the personal relevance of high-school mathematics and science courses and involve parents in helping to promote STEM preparation and career pursuit.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1607386114

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Interventions that aim to increase the value that parents place on education have been shown to increase their children's educational attainment.

    “Interventions that aim to increase the value that parents place on education have been shown to increase their children's educational attainment (Harackiewicz et al., 2012;Rozek, Svoboda, Harackiewicz, Hulleman, & Hyde, 2017)”

    From Tackling Educational Inequalities with Social Psychology: Identities, Contexts, and Interventions (2021) · cites this paper as Rozek, Svoboda, Harackiewicz, Hulleman, & Hyde, 2017

    The Current Study section (page unavailable) describes an intervention that encouraged parents to communicate the value of mathematics and science; it also reports that changes in parents’ and students’ STEM attitudes mediated increased high-school STEM course-taking. The Direct Intervention Effects section (page unavailable) reports higher mathematics and science ACT scores. These findings support improved STEM outcomes, but the claim broadens them to education and educational attainment generally. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. Maltese AV, Tai RH (2011) Pipeline persistence: Examining the association of educa- tional experiences with earned degrees in STEM among US students. Sci Educ 95(5): 877-907.
  2. Schmidt WH, Burroughs NA, Zoido P, Houang RT (2015) The role of schooling in perpetuating educational inequality: An international perspective. Educ Res 44(7): 371-386.
  3. Trusty J (2002) Effects of high school course-taking and other variables on choice of science and mathematics college majors. J Couns Dev 80(4):464-474.
  4. Updegraff KA, Eccles JS, Barber BL, O'brien KM (1996) Course enrollment as self- regulatory behavior: Who takes optional high school math courses? Learn Individ Differ 8(3):239-259.
  5. Harackiewicz JM, Smith JL, Priniski SJ (2016) Interest matters. The importance of promoting interest in education. Policy Insights Behav Brain Sci 3(2):220-227.
  6. Lazowski RA, Hulleman CS (2016) Motivation interventions in education. A meta- analytic review. Rev Educ Res 86(2):602-640.
  7. Durik AM, Harackiewicz JM (2007) Different strokes for different folks: How indi- vidual interest moderates the effects of situational factors on task interest. J Educ Psychol 99(3):597-610.
  8. Durik AM, Shechter OG, Noh M, Rozek CS, Harackiewicz JM (2014) What if I can't? Success expectancies moderate the effects of utility value information on situational interest and performance. Motiv Emot 39(1):104-118.
  9. Harackiewicz JM, Canning EA, Tibbetts Y, Priniski SJ, Hyde JS (2015) Closing achievement gaps with a utility-value intervention: Disentangling race and social class. J Pers Soc Psychol 111(5):745-765.
  10. Canning EA, Harackiewicz JM (2015) Teach it, don't preach it: The differential effects of directly-communicated and self-generated utility value information. Motiv Sci 1(1):47-71.
  11. Gaspard H, et al. (2015) Fostering adolescents' value beliefs for mathematics with a relevance intervention in the classroom. Dev Psychol 51(9):1226-1240.
  12. Maloney EA, Converse BA, Gibbs CR, Levine SC, Beilock SL (2015) Jump-starting early childhood education at home: Early learning, parent motivation, and public policy. Perspect Psychol Sci 10(6):727-732.
  13. Lazarides R, Harackiewicz J, Canning E, Pesu L, Vilaranta J (2015) The role of parents in students' motivational beliefs and values. Routledge International Handbook of Social Psychology of the Classroom, eds Rubie-Davies CR, Stephens J, Watson P (Routledge, London), pp 53-66.
  14. Simpkins SD, Fredricks JA, Eccles JS (2012) Charting the Eccles' expectancy-value model from mothers' beliefs in childhood to youths' activities in adolescence. Dev Psychol 48(4):1019-1032.
  15. Simpkins SD, Price CD, Garcia K (2015) Parental support and high school students' motivation in biology, chemistry, and physics: Understanding differences among La- tino and Caucasian boys and girls. J Res Sci Teach 52(10):1386-1407.
  16. Chase-Lansdale L, Brooks-Gunn J (2014) Two-generation programs in the twenty-first century. Future Child 24(1):13-39.
  17. Rozek CS, Hyde JS, Svoboda RC, Hulleman CS, Harackiewicz JM (2015) Gender dif- ferences in the effects of a utility-value intervention to help parents motivate ado- lescents in mathematics and science. J Educ Psychol 107(1):195-206.
  18. Hyde JS, Klein MH, Essex MJ, Clark R (1995) Maternity leave and women's mental health. Psychol Women Q 19(2):257-285.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rozek, C. S., Svoboda, R. C., Harackiewicz, J. M., Hulleman, C. S., & Hyde, J. S.
Affiliations
  • University of Chicago (US)
  • Northwestern University (US)
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
  • University of Virginia (US)
Corresponding author
Hyde, Janet S.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2017-01-17
Volume
114
Issue
5
Pages
909-914
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2573228117
Cited by
218
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 72 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2
FWCI
72.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (0814750)
  • DoED | Institute of Education Sciences (R305B090009, R305B140042)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Career Development and Diversity
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Science Education and Perceptions
Keywords
parental intervention, utility value intervention, high school students, mathematics achievement, science achievement, ACT scores, STEM attitudes, long-term effects, STEM education
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aptitude Tests, Career Choice, Educational Status, Engineering, Female, Humans, Male, Mathematics, Models, Theoretical, Motivation, Parents, Science, Students, Technology, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review