CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 305Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentPsychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual OffendingCrime Patterns and Interventions

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 48 of the 48 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Four-year longitudinal study of conduct disorder in boys: patterns and predictors of persistence

Lahey, Benjamin B., Loeber, Rolf, Hart, Elizabeth L., Frick, Paul J., Applegate, Brooks, Zhang, Quanwu, Green, Stephanie M., Russo, Mary F.·1995·Journal of Abnormal Psychology
DOI 10.1037/0021-843x.104.1.83
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

A prospective study of conduct disorder (CD) was conducted using 4 annual structured diagnostic interviews of 171 clinic-referred boys, their parents, and their teachers. Only about half of the 65 boys who met criteria for CD in Year 1 met criteria again during the next year, but 88% met criteria for CD again at least once during the next 3 years. For most boys with CD, the number of symptoms fluctuated above and below the diagnostic threshold from year to year but remained relatively high. Lower socioeconomic status, parental antisocial personality disorder (APD), and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder were significant correlates of CD in Year 1, but the interaction of parental APD and the boy's verbal intelligence predicted the persistence of CD symptoms over time (i.e., only boys without a parent with APD and with above-average verbal intelligence clearly improved).

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0021-843x.104.1.83

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 305

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Lahey, B. B., Loeber, R., Hart, E. L., Frick, P. J., Applegate, B., Zhang, Q., Green, S. M., & Russo, M. F.
Affiliations
  • University of Chicago (US)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • Yale University (US)
  • University of Alabama (US)
  • University of Miami (US)
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Abnormal Psychology
Publisher
American Psychological Association (APA)
Published
1995-02
Volume
104
Issue
1
Pages
83-93
ISSN
  • 0021-843X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1846
DOI
10.1037/0021-843x.104.1.83
OpenAlex
W2016593622
Cited by
305
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 9 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 8
FWCI
13.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Abnormal Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Civil War Book Review (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH042529, 1-R01-MH42529)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
Keywords
conduct disorder, boys, longitudinal trends, socioeconomic status, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, verbal intelligence, predictors of persistence, clinic-referred children
MeSH terms
Child, Child Behavior Disorders, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Parents, Prospective Studies, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Socioeconomic Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review