The DOI matches its Crossref record; 54 of the 55 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Context-processing deficits in schizophrenia: Diagnostic specificity, 4-week course, and relationships to clinical symptoms.
Abstract
Previous research on schizophrenia suggests that context-processing disturbances are one of the core cognitive deficits present in schizophia. However, it is not clear whether such deficits are specific to schizophrenia as compared with other psychotic disorders. To address this question, the authors administered a version of the AX Continuous Performance Test designed to assess context processing in a sample of healthy controls, patients with schizophrenia, and patients with other psychotic disorders. Participants were tested at index (when medication naive and experiencing their first contact with psychiatric services) and 4 weeks later, following medication treatment. At index, patients with schizophrenia and the psychotic comparison group demonstrated similar impairments in context processing. However, context-processing deficits improved in the psychotic comparison group at 4 weeks but did not improve in patients with schizophrenia.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Interestingly, people in the schizophrenia spectrum fail to develop this normal bias and do not have an increase in errors of commission with increased frequency of targets. 34”
From Domains of cognition and their assessment (2019) · cites this paper as [34]
Citations
Cites
Applied Linear Statistical Models
Ziegel, E. R., Neter, J., Wasserman, W., & Kutner, M. (1992) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1269588 · Cited by 9,906
Applied Linear Statistical Models
Kutner, M., Nachtsheim, C. J., Neter, J., & Li, W. (1997) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.1997.10485141 · Cited by 7,186
Applied Linear Statistical Models.
Lorenz, F. O., Neter, J., Wasserman, W., & Kutner, M. (1986) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2289108 · Cited by 5,566
Attention to Action: Willed and Automatic Control of Behavior
Norman, D. A., & Shallice, T. (1986) · Consciousness and Self-Regulation · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-0629-1_1 · Cited by 4,455
Cohen, J., MacWhinney, B., Flatt, M., & Provost, J. (1993) · Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers · doi:10.3758/bf03204507 · Cited by 2,802
Self-citationScale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS)*
(1989) · The British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/s0007125000291502 · Cited by 2,710
Comparing correlated correlation coefficients
Meng, X.-L., Rosenthal, R., & Rubin, D. B. (1992) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.111.1.172 · Cited by 2,472
Scale for Assessment of Positive Symptoms (SAPS) 1984
Andreasen, N. C. (1995) · Open Scholarship Institutional Repository (Washington University in St. Louis) · Cited by 2,423
A continuous performance test of brain damage
Rosvold, H. E., Mirsky, A. F., Sarason, I., Bransome, E. D., & Beck, L. H. (1956) · Journal of Consulting Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0043220 · Cited by 2,261
The Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS): Conceptual and Theoretical Foundations
Andreasen, N. C. (1989) · The British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/s0007125000291496 · Cited by 1,532
Research works printed but not linked: 5
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The contextual brain: implications for fear conditioning, extinction and psychopathology
Maren, S., Phan, K. L., & Liberzon, I. (2013) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn3492 · Cited by 1,547
Schizophrenia, “just the facts” 4. Clinical features and conceptualization
Tandon, R., Nasrallah, H. A., & Keshavan, M. S. (2009) · Schizophrenia Research · doi:10.1016/j.schres.2009.03.005 · Cited by 1,101
Construct Validity: Advances in Theory and Methodology
Strauss, M. E., & Smith, G. T. (2008) · Annual Review of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.032408.153639 · Cited by 876
Working Memory Impairments in Schizophrenia: A Meta-Analysis.
Lee, J., & Park, S. (2005) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-843x.114.4.599 · Cited by 770
Domains of cognition and their assessment
Harvey, P. D. (2019) · Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience · doi:10.31887/dcns.2019.21.3/pharvey · Cited by 695
Metadata
- Authors
- Barch, D. M., Carter, C. S., MacDonald, A. W., Braver, T. S., & Cohen, J. D.
- Affiliations
- Washington University in St. Louis (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Abnormal Psychology
- Published
- 2003-02
- Volume
- 112
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 132-143
- ISSN
- 0021-843X (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1846
- OpenAlex
- W2151392566
- Cited by
- 255
- References
- 55
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 12.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Abnormal Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Mental Health (MH47073, MH 45156, P50MH045156)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Keywords
- schizophrenia, context processing, cognitive impairment, psychosis, diagnostic specificity, antipsychotic drugs, symptom improvement, first-episode psychosis
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Cognition Disorders, Female, Humans, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Psychotic Disorders, Random Allocation, Reaction Time, Schizophrenia, Semantics, Sensitivity and Specificity, Antipsychotic Agents
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
