Cited by 250Reliability and Agreement in MeasurementManagement and Performance EvaluationHuman Resource Development and Performance Evaluation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Rater bias in performance ratings: Superior, self-, and peer ratings.

Holzbach, Robert L.·1978·Journal of Applied Psychology

DOI 10.1037/0021-9010.63.5.579

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Leniency errors, halo effects, and differential dimensionality were explored in an analysis of superior, self-, and peer performance ratings of 107 managerial and 76 professional employees in a medium-sized manufacturing location, representing 95% of the managerial and professional staff. Self-ratin

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0021-9010.63.5.579

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix.
Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0046016 · Cited by 17,116
A General Method for Analysis of Covariance Structures
Jöreskog, K. G. (1970) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/57.2.239 · Cited by 1,235
Retranslation of expectations: An approach to the construction of unambiguous anchors for rating scales.
Smith, P. C., & Kendall, L. M. (1963) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0047060 · Cited by 838
The multitrait-multirater approach to measuring managerial job performance.
Lawler, E. E. (1967) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0025095 · Cited by 304
Comparisons of self- and superior ratings of managerial performance.
Heneman, H. G. (1974) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0037341 · Cited by 286
The rating of individuals in organizations: An alternate approach
Borman, W. C. (1974) · Organizational Behavior and Human Performance · doi:10.1016/0030-5073(74)90040-3 · Cited by 218
Issues in managerial performance: Multitrait-multimethod analyses of ratings.
Kavanagh, M. J., MacKinney, A. C., & Wolins, L. (1971) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0030412 · Cited by 208
Role of the rater in performance appraisal.
Klimoski, R. J., & London, M. (1974) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0037332 · Cited by 166
THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SUPERVISORY‐ AND SELF‐APPRAISALS OF EXECUTIVE PERFORMANCE
Thornton, G. C. (1968) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1968.tb02044.x · Cited by 132
EFFECT OF INSTRUCTIONAL CONDITIONS IN PRODUCING LENIENCY ON TWO TYPES OF RATING SCALES1
Sharon, A. T., & Bartlett, C. J. (1969) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1969.tb00330.x · Cited by 92

Show all 18 references

WORK ENGAGEMENT: A QUANTITATIVE REVIEW AND TEST OF ITS RELATIONS WITH TASK AND CONTEXTUAL PERFORMANCE
CHRISTIAN, M. S., GARZA, A. S., & SLAUGHTER, J. E. (2011) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2010.01203.x · Cited by 2,903
Common methods bias: does common methods variance really bias results?
Doty, D. H., & Glick, W. H. (1998) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/109442819814002 · Cited by 1,380
A META‐ANALYSIS OF SELF‐SUPERVISOR, SELF‐PEER, AND PEER‐SUPERVISOR RATINGS
HARRIS, M. M., & SCHAUBROECK, J. (1988) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1988.tb00631.x · Cited by 1,080
A competence‐based and multidimensional operationalization and measurement of employability
der Heijde, C. M. V., & HEIJDEN, B. I. J. M. V. D. (2006) · Human Resource Management · doi:10.1002/hrm.20119 · Cited by 1,191
Organizational citizenship behavior and objective productivity as determinants of managerial evaluations of salespersons' performance
MacKenzie, S. B., Podsakoff, P. M., & Fetter, R. (1991) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90037-t · Cited by 807
Socially Desirable Responding in Organizational Behavior: A Reconception
Zerbe, W. J., & Paulhus, D. L. (1987) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1987.4307820 · Cited by 732
Two replicable suppressor situations in personality research
Paulhus, D. L., Robins, R. W., Trzesniewski, K. H., & Tracy, J. L. (2004) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr3902_7 · Cited by 631
Quantitative studies of student self-assessment in higher education: a critical analysis of findings
Boud, D., & Falchikov, N. (1989) · Higher Education · doi:10.1007/bf00138746 · Cited by 616
Suppression situations in psychological research: Definitions, implications, and applications
Tzelgov, J., & Henik, A. (1991) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.109.3.524 · Cited by 424
DOES SELF‐OTHER AGREEMENT ON LEADERSHIP PERCEPTIONS MODERATE THE VALIDITY OF LEADERSHIP AND PERFORMANCE PREDICTIONS?
ATWATER, L. E., & Yammarino, F. J. (1992) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1992.tb00848.x · Cited by 563
Self-Assessment of Knowledge: A Cognitive Learning or Affective Measure?
Sitzmann, T., Ely, K., Brown, K. G., & Bauer, K. N. (2010) · Academy of Management Learning and Education · doi:10.5465/amle.9.2.zqr169 · Cited by 551
Psychometric Properties of Multisource Performance Ratings: A meta-Analysis of Subordinate, Supervisor, Peer, and Self-Ratings
Conway, J. M., & Huffcutt, A. I. (1997) · Human Performance · doi:10.1207/s15327043hup1004_2 · Cited by 469
Distinguishing contextual performance from task performance for managerial jobs.
Conway, J. M. (1999) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.84.1.3 · Cited by 450
Is There a General Factor in Ratings of Job Performance? A Meta-Analytic Framework for Disentangling Substantive and Error Influences.
Viswesvaran, C., Schmidt, F. L., & Ones, D. S. (2005) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.90.1.108 · Cited by 411
The criterion problem: 1917-1992.
Austin, J. T., & Villanova, P. (1992) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037//0021-9010.77.6.836 · Cited by 403
The relationship between career motivation and self-efficacy with protégé career success
Day, R., & Allen, T. D. (2003) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0001-8791(03)00036-8 · Cited by 435
VALIDITY AND FAIRNESS OF SOME ALTERNATIVE EMPLOYEE SELECTION PROCEDURES1
REILLY, R. R., & Chao, G. T. (1982) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1982.tb02184.x · Cited by 393
A role set analysis of managerial reputation
Tsui, A. S. (1984) · Organizational Behavior and Human Performance · doi:10.1016/0030-5073(84)90037-0 · Cited by 354
Validity of personnel decisions: A conceptual analysis of the inferential and evidential bases.
Binning, J. F., & Barrett, G. V. (1989) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.74.3.478 · Cited by 345
INTERVIEWER ASSESSMENTS OF APPLICANT “FIT”: AN EXPLORATORY INVESTIGATION
Rynes, S. L., & Gerhart, B. A. (1990) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1990.tb02004.x · Cited by 324
Methodology Review: Analysis of Multitrait-Multimethod Matrices
Schmitt, N., & Stults, D. M. (1986) · Applied Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/014662168601000101 · Cited by 311
Nature and consequences of halo error: A critical analysis.
Murphy, K. R., Jako, R. A., & Anhalt, R. L. (1993) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.78.2.218 · Cited by 308
Self–other agreement in job performance ratings: A meta-analytic test of a process model.
Heidemeier, H., & Moser, K. (2009) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.94.2.353 · Cited by 295
Comparing the Accuracy of Personality Judgments by the Self and Knowledgeable Others
Kolar, D. W., Funder, D. C., & Colvin, C. R. (1996) · Journal of Personality · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1996.tb00513.x · Cited by 308
CULTURAL RELATIVITY IN ACTION: A COMPARISON OF SELF‐RATINGS MADE BY CHINESE AND U.S. WORKERS
Farh, J., Dobbins, G. H., & Cheng, B. (1991) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1991.tb00693.x · Cited by 271
PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES OF SELF‐APPRAISALS OF JOB PERFORMANCE
Thornton, G. C. (1980) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1980.tb02348.x · Cited by 255
THE INFLUENCE OF UPWARD FEEDBACK ON SELF‐ AND FOLLOWER RATINGS OF LEADERSHIP
ATWATER, L., ROUSH, P., & FISCHTHAL, A. (1995) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1995.tb01745.x · Cited by 253
Self-Appraisal in Performance Evaluation: Development Versus Evaluation
Campbell, D. J., & Lee, C. (1988) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1988.4306896 · Cited by 249
Is Leadership in the Eye of the Beholder? A Study of Intended and Perceived Leadership Practices and Organizational Performance
Jacobsen, C. B., & Andersen, L. B. (2015) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/puar.12380 · Cited by 268
RESEARCH NOTES. INTERPERSONAL AFFECT AND RATING ERRORS.
Tsui, A. S., & Barry, B. (1986) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256225 · Cited by 206
A critique of the correlated trait-correlated method and correlated uniqueness models for multitrait-multimethod data.
Lance, C. E., Noble, C. L., & Scullen, S. E. (2002) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.7.2.228 · Cited by 207
Trading on illusions: Unrealistic perceptions of control and trading performance
Fenton‐O’Creevy, M., Nicholson, N., Soane, E., & Willman, P. (2003) · Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1348/096317903321208880 · Cited by 198
Narcissism and emergent leadership in military cadets
Paunonen, S. V., Lönnqvist, J., Verkasalo, M., Leikas, S., & Nissinen, V. (2006) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.06.003 · Cited by 199
AN EXAMINATION OF THE EFFECTS OF AN UPWARD FEEDBACK PROGRAM OVER TIME
Smither, J. W., London, M., Vasilopoulos, N. L., REILLY, R. R., Millsap, R. E., & Salvemini, N. J. (1995) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1995.tb01744.x · Cited by 176
Characteristics and user acceptance of peer rating in EFL writing classrooms
Saito, H., & Fujita, T. (2004) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1191/1362168804lr133oa · Cited by 156
Expatriate assignment, adjustment and effectiveness: an empirical examination of the big picture
Shay, J. P., & Baack, S. (2004) · Journal of International Business Studies · doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400081 · Cited by 155
An Empirical Review of the Employment Interview Construct Literature
Huffcutt, A. I. (2011) · International Journal of Selection and Assessment · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2389.2010.00535.x · Cited by 165
Evaluating the performance of paper people.
Murphy, K. R., Herr, B. M., Lockhart, M. C., & Maguire, E. (1986) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.71.4.654 · Cited by 142
MULTIPLE ASSESSMENT OF MANAGERIAL EFFECTIVENESS: INTERRATER AGREEMENT AND CONSENSUS IN EFFECTIVENESS MODELS
Tsui, A. S., & Ohlott, P. J. (1988) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1988.tb00654.x · Cited by 139
RATER SOURCE EFFECTS ARE ALIVE AND WELL AFTER ALL
Hoffman, B. J., Lance, C., Bynum, B. H., & Gentry, W. A. (2010) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2009.01164.x · Cited by 143
EXPECTATIONS OF BEHAVIORALLY ANCHORED RATING SCALES
Jacobs, R. R., Kafry, D., & Zedeck, S. (1980) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1980.tb00486.x · Cited by 137
AGREEMENT BETWEEN SUBORDINATE AND SELF‐RATINGS IN UPWARD FEEDBACK
London, M., & Wohlers, A. J. (1991) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1991.tb00964.x · Cited by 134
Nobel and novice: Author prominence affects peer review
Huber, J., Inoua, S., Kerschbamer, R., König-Kersting, C., Palan, S., & Smith, V. L. (2022) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2205779119 · Cited by 148
Enriching Our Understanding of Student Team Effectiveness
Deeter‐Schmelz, D. R., Kennedy, K. N., & Lagace, R. R. (2002) · Journal of Marketing Education · doi:10.1177/0273475302242004 · Cited by 131
The moderating influence of job performance dimensions on convergence of supervisory and peer ratings of job performance: Unconfounding construct-level convergence and rating difficulty.
Viswesvaran, C., Schmidt, F. L., & Öneş, D. S. (2002) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.87.2.345 · Cited by 126
A COMPARISON OF CRITERIA FOR TEST VALIDATION: A META‐ANALYTIC INVESTIGATION
Nathan, B. R., & Alexander, R. A. (1988) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1988.tb00642.x · Cited by 124
SELF‐ASSESSED TRAINING NEEDS: THE EFFECTS OF ATTITUDES TOWARD TRAINING, MANAGERIAL LEVEL, AND FUNCTION
Ford, J. K., & Noe, R. A. (1987) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1987.tb02376.x · Cited by 122
Job performance and turnover.
Martin, T. N., Price, J. L., & Mueller, C. W. (1981) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.66.1.116 · Cited by 121
PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES OF SUBORDINATE RATINGS OF MANAGERIAL PERFORMANCE
Mount, M. K. (1984) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1984.tb00533.x · Cited by 120
Personnel Selection and Classification
Tenopyr, M. L., & Oeltjen, P. D. (1982) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.33.020182.003053 · Cited by 120
360° feedback process: performance, improvement and employee career development
McCarthy, A. M., & Garavan, T. N. (2001) · Journal of European Industrial Training · doi:10.1108/03090590110380614 · Cited by 118
The Development and Psychometric Evaluation of a Multidimensional Measurement Instrument of Professional Expertise
HEIJDEN, B. I. J. M. V. D., & HEIJDEN, M. V. D. (2000) · High Ability Studies · doi:10.1080/713669175 · Cited by 124
Expatriate career support: predicting expatriate turnover and performance
van der Heijden, J. A. V., Engen, M. L. V., & Paauwe, J. (2009) · The International Journal of Human Resource Management · doi:10.1080/09585190902770745 · Cited by 114
Rating leniency and halo in multisource feedback ratings: Testing cultural assumptions of power distance and individualism-collectivism.
Ng, K., Koh, C. S. K., Ang, S., Kennedy, J. C., & Chan, K.-Y. (2011) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0023368 · Cited by 120
MULTIFACETED CONCEPTIONS OF SELF‐OTHER RATINGS DISAGREEMENT
Cheung, G. W. (1999) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1999.tb01811.x · Cited by 112
The value of subjectivity: problems and prospects for 360-degree appraisal systems
HEIJDEN, B. I. J. M. V. D., & Nijhof, A. H. J. (2004) · The International Journal of Human Resource Management · doi:10.1080/0958519042000181223 · Cited by 112
Climbing the Commitment Ladder: The Role of Expectations Disconfirmation on Customers’ Behavioral Intentions
White, S. S., & Schneider, B. (2000) · Journal of Service Research · doi:10.1177/109467050023002 · Cited by 104
EFFECTS OF GENDER ON SELF- AND SUPERVISORY RATINGS.
Shore, L. M., & Thornton, G. C. (1986) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/255863 · Cited by 101
Analysis and Design of Multitrait-Multirater Performance Appraisal Studies
Conway, J. M. (1996) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1016/s0149-2063(96)90015-x · Cited by 97
The relationship between rater affect and three sources of 360-degree feedback ratings
Antonioni, D., & Park, H. (2001) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1016/s0149-2063(01)00104-0 · Cited by 97
Comment on Halo Effects in Rating and Evaluation Research
Feeley, T. H. (2002) · Human Communication Research · doi:10.1093/hcr/28.4.578 · Cited by 99
Capturing a More Complete View of Employees’ Lives Outside of Work: The Introduction and Development of New Interrole Conflict Constructs
Wilson, K. S., & Baumann, H. M. (2014) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/peps.12080 · Cited by 97
Rater source factors represent important subcomponents of the criterion construct space, not rater bias
Lance, C. E., Hoffman, B. J., Gentry, W. A., & Baranik, L. E. (2008) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2008.03.002 · Cited by 92
Research Note—The Halo Effect in Multicomponent Ratings and Its Implications for Recommender Systems: The Case of Yahoo! Movies
Sahoo, N., Krishnan, R., Duncan, G. T., & Callan, J. (2011) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.1100.0336 · Cited by 92
Congruence in sales force evaluations: Relation to sales force perceptions of conflict and ambiguity
Chonko, L. B., Howell, R. D., & Bellenger, D. N. (2013) · Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management · doi:10.1080/08853134.1986.10754412 · Cited by 91
An Empirical Investigation of the Relationships between Modes and Degree of Expatriate Adjustment and Multiple Measures of Performance
Shay, J. P., & Baack, S. (2006) · International Journal of Cross Cultural Management · doi:10.1177/1470595806070634 · Cited by 88
Cognitive Biases in Performance Appraisal: Experimental Evidence on Anchoring and Halo Effects With Public Sector Managers and Employees
Bellè, N., Cantarelli, P., & Belardinelli, P. (2017) · Review of Public Personnel Administration · doi:10.1177/0734371x17704891 · Cited by 87
Statistical control of halo error in performance ratings.
Landy, F. J., Vance, R. J., Barnes-Farrell, J. L., & Steele, J. W. (1980) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037//0021-9010.65.5.501 · Cited by 87
Behavioral Public HR: Experimental Evidence on Cognitive Biases and Debiasing Interventions
Cantarelli, P., Bellè, N., & Belardinelli, P. (2018) · Review of Public Personnel Administration · doi:10.1177/0734371x18778090 · Cited by 90
The Risk of a Halo Bias as a Reason to Keep Students Anonymous During Grading
Malouff, J. M., Emmerton, A. J., & Schutte, N. S. (2013) · Teaching of Psychology · doi:10.1177/0098628313487425 · Cited by 81
Implicit personality and performance appraisal: The influence of trait inferences on evaluations of behavior.
Krzystofiak, F. J., Cardy, R. L., & Newman, J. M. (1988) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037//0021-9010.73.3.515 · Cited by 76
Additional Construct Validity Evidence for the Task/Contextual Performance Distinction
Conway, J. M. (1996) · Human Performance · doi:10.1207/s15327043hup0904_1 · Cited by 76
Modelling Method Effects as Individual Causal Effects
Pohl, S., Steyer, R., & Kraus, K. (2007) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A (Statistics in Society) · doi:10.1111/j.1467-985x.2007.00517.x · Cited by 75
Effects of purpose of the appraisal and expectation of validation on self-appraisal leniency.
Farh, J., & Werbel, J. D. (1986) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037//0021-9010.71.3.527 · Cited by 75
A CLOSER LOOK AT HALO ERROR IN PERFORMANCE RATINGS.
Jacobs, R., & Kozlowski, S. W. J. (1985) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256068 · Cited by 74
Construct validity of multiple job performance measures using confirmatory factor analysis.
Vance, R. J., MacCallum, R. C., Coovert, M. D., & Hedge, J. W. (1988) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.73.1.74 · Cited by 74
SELF‐APPRAISAL BASED UPON SUPERVISORY FEEDBACK
Steel, R. P., & Ovalle, N. K. (1984) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1984.tb00532.x · Cited by 73
Halo Effects in Trait Assessment Depend on Information Valence: Why Being Honest Makes You Industrious, but Lying Does Not Make You Lazy
Gräf, M., & Unkelbach, C. (2016) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167215627137 · Cited by 78
Extending and testing a five factor model of ethical and unethical bargaining tactics: introducing the SINS scale
Robinson, R. J., Lewicki, R. J., & Donahue, E. M. (2000) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/1099-1379(200009)21:6<627::aid-job43>3.0.co;2-d · Cited by 304
Congruence in Job-Performance Ratings: A Study of 360° Feedback Examining Self, Manager, Peers, and Consultant Ratings
Furnham, A. F., & Stringfield, P. (1998) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/001872679805100404 · Cited by 66
Getting Comfortable on Audits: Understanding Firms’ Usage of Forensic Specialists
Jenkins, J. G., Negangard, E. M., & Oler, M. J. (2017) · Contemporary Accounting Research · doi:10.1111/1911-3846.12359 · Cited by 65
Difficulties in the statistical control of halo.
Murphy, K. R. (1982) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037//0021-9010.67.2.161 · Cited by 65
Measuring individual work performance
Koopmans, L. (2014) · Digital Academic REpository of VU University Amsterdam (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam) · Cited by 63
Motivational Ratings
Hörner, J., & Lambert, N. S. (2016) · The Review of Economic Studies · doi:10.1093/restud/rdaa070 · Cited by 67
Do self-reported decision styles relate with others’ impressions of decision quality?
Wood, N. L., & Highhouse, S. (2014) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2014.06.036 · Cited by 66
Influence of halo error on appraisal effectiveness: A conceptual and empirical reconsideration.
Becker, B. E., & Cardy, R. L. (1986) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037//0021-9010.71.4.662 · Cited by 60
Information Revelation in Relational Contracts
Fong, Y., & Li, J. (2016) · The Review of Economic Studies · doi:10.1093/restud/rdw035 · Cited by 56
ORGANIZATION AND RATER DIFFERENCES IN PERFORMANCE APPRAISALS
Zammuto, R. F., London, M., & Rowland, K. M. (1982) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1982.tb02216.x · Cited by 55
The Validity and Fairness of Alternatives to Cognitive Tests
Reilly, R. R., & Warech, M. A. (1994) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-011-2202-3_4 · Cited by 55
Transsituational variability in human performance within assessment centers
Turnage, J. J., & Muchinsky, P. M. (1982) · Organizational Behavior and Human Performance · doi:10.1016/0030-5073(82)90217-3 · Cited by 55
CEILING IN THE RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF PERFORMANCE RATINGS: THE CASE OF EXPERT RATERS.
Weekley, J. A., & Gier, J. A. (1989) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256428 · Cited by 55
Transformational leadership across hierarchical levels in UK manufacturing organizations
Edwards, G., & Gill, R. C. (2012) · Leadership & Organization Development Journal · doi:10.1108/01437731211193106 · Cited by 55
Job performance as a moderator of the satisfaction — turnover intention relation: An empirical contrast of two perspectives
Lance, C. E. (1988) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.4030090307 · Cited by 49
Cultural and individual differences in self‐rating behavior: an extension and refinement of the cultural relativity hypothesis
Xie, J. L., Roy, J., & Chen, Z. (2006) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.375 · Cited by 51
Feedback frequency and appraisal reactions: a meta-analytic test of moderators
Pichler, S. M., Beenen, G., & Wood, S. (2018) · The International Journal of Human Resource Management · doi:10.1080/09585192.2018.1443961 · Cited by 56
De-escalation of commitment in software projects: Who matters? What matters?
Heng, C. S., Tan, B. C. Y., & Wei, K. (2003) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/s0378-7206(03)00030-2 · Cited by 47
The impact of performance cues on leader-behavior ratings: The role of selective information availability and probabilistic response bias
Larson, J. R., Lingle, J. H., & Scerbo, M. M. (1984) · Organizational Behavior and Human Performance · doi:10.1016/0030-5073(84)90027-8 · Cited by 45
Assuring validity of multisource feedback in a national programme
Archer, J. C., McGraw, M. E., & Davies, H. (2010) · Archives of Disease in Childhood · doi:10.1136/adc.2008.146209 · Cited by 44
Antecedents and outcomes of employee perceptions of intra‐organizational mobility channels
Webster, J. R., & Beehr, T. A. (2012) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.1823 · Cited by 53
Attributions, cognitive processes and control systems
Shields, M. D., Birnberg, J. G., & Frieze, I. H. (1981) · Accounting Organizations and Society · doi:10.1016/0361-3682(81)90023-4 · Cited by 39

Authors: Holzbach, R. L.
Corresponding author: Holzbach, Robert L.
Venue: Journal of Applied Psychology
Publisher: American Psychological Association (APA)
Published: 1978-10
Volume: 63
Issue: 5
Pages: 579-588
ISSN: 0021-9010 (ISSN-L)
1939-1854
DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.63.5.579
OpenAlex: W1969548676
Cited by: 249
References: 18
Citations by year: 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 11
FWCI: 10.33
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed
Locations: Journal of Applied Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics: Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Reliability and Agreement in Measurement
Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management and Performance Evaluation
Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Human Resource Development and Performance Evaluation
Keywords: rater bias, performance ratings, self-ratings, peer ratings, leniency effect, halo effect, managers, working professionals, manufacturing workforce

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.

Rater bias in performance ratings: Superior, self-, and peer ratings.

Abstract

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks

Data sources