A new, more powerful approach to multitrait^multimethod analyses: Application of second-order confirmatory factor analysis.

Marsh, Herbert W., Hocevar, Dennis·1988·Journal of Applied Psychology
DOI 10.1037//0021-9010.73.1.107

Abstract

The advantages of applying confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to multitrait-multimethod (MTMM) data are widely recognized. However, because CFA. as traditionally applied to MTMM data, incorporates single indicators of each scale (i.e., each trait-method combination), important weaknesses are the failure to (a) correct appropriately for measurement error in scale scores, (b) separate error due to law internal consistency from uniqueness due to weak trait or method effects, (c) test whether items or subscales accurately reflect the intended factor structure, and (d) test for correlated uniquenesses. However, when the analysis begins with multiple indicators of each scale (i.e., items or subscales), second-order factor analysis can be used to address each of these problems. In this approach, first-order factors defined by multiple items or subscales are posited for each scale, and the method and trait factors are posited as second-order factors.

Cites (2)

  1. Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix.
    Campbell, Donald T., Fiske, Donald W. · 1959 · Psychological Bulletin
  2. A comparison of some methodologies for the factor analysis of non‐normal Likert variables
    Muthén, Bengt, Kaplan, David · 1985 · British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology

Show all 2 references

Cited by (31)

  1. Assessing construct validity in organizational research
    Bagozzi, Richard P., Yi, Youjae, Phillips, Lynn W. · 1991 · Administrative Science Quarterly
  2. To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits
    Little, Todd D., Cunningham, William A., Shahar, Golan, Widaman, Keith F. · 2002 · Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal
  3. A Brief Tutorial on the Development of Measures for Use in Survey Questionnaires
    Hinkin, Timothy R. · 1998 · Organizational Research Methods
  4. Validation Guidelines for IS Positivist Research
    Straub, Detmar, Gefen, David · 2004 · Communications of the Association for Information Systems
  5. Post-Adoption Variations in Usage and Value of E-Business by Organizations: Cross-Country Evidence from the Retail Industry
    Zhu, Kevin, Kraemer, Kenneth L. · 2005 · Information Systems Research

See all 529

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A new, more powerful approach to multitrait^multimethod analyses: Application of second-order confirmatory factor analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0021-9010.73.1.107
The paper
Marsh, H. W., & Hocevar, D. (1988). A new, more powerful approach to multitrait^multimethod analyses: Application of second-order confirmatory factor analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.73.1.107

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.