Cited by 572Psychological Testing and AssessmentPersonality Traits and PsychologyEmployer Branding and e-HRM

Personality measurement and employment decisions: Questions and answers.

Hogan, Robert, Hogan, Joyce, Roberts, Brent W.·1996·American Psychologist

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0003-066x.51.5.469

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hogan, R., Hogan, J., & Roberts, B. W.
Affiliations
  • University of Tulsa (US)
  • Carl R. Woese Institute for Genomic Biology (US)
Venue
American Psychologist
Published
1996-05
Volume
51
Issue
5
Pages
469-477
ISSN
  • 0003-066X (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-990X
OpenAlex
W1970427037
Cited by
572
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 33
FWCI
22.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
American Psychologist (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Employer Branding and e-HRM
Keywords
personality assessment, employment decisions, personnel selection, job performance prediction, personality assessment validity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review