The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Job demands and worker health: Three-dimensional reexamination of the relationship between person-environment fit and strain.
Abstract
The most influential study of the person-environment (P-E) fit approach to stress was conducted by J. R. P. French, R. D. Caplan, and R. V. Harrison (1982). Unfortunately, this study operationalized fit using various transformations of difference scores, thereby introducing numerous substantive and methodological problems. In the present study, the authors reanalyze data from French et al., using a procedure described by J. R. Edwards (in press) that avoids problems with difference scores and captures the underlying three-dimensional relationship between E, P, and strain. Results resolve ambiguities in the French et al. findings and identify relationships between E, P, and strain that, although consistent with P-E fit theory, cannot be adequately represented by fit measures such as those used by French et al. Implications for P-E fit research are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Job Demands, Job Decision Latitude, and Mental Strain: Implications for Job Redesign
Karasek, R. A. (1979) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392498 · Cited by 12,597
EDWARDS, J. R., & PARRY, M. E. (1993) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256822 · Cited by 1,534
Self-citation
Cited by
KRISTOF‐BROWN, A. L., ZIMMERMAN, R. D., & JOHNSON, E. C. (2005) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2005.00672.x · Cited by 4,082
EDWARDS, J. R., & PARRY, M. E. (1993) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256822 · Cited by 1,534
Self-citationComplementary and Supplementary Fit: A Theoretical and Empirical Integration.
Cable, D. M., & Edwards, J. R. (2004) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.89.5.822 · Cited by 949
Self-citationThoresen, C. J., Kaplan, S. A., Barsky, A. P., Warren, C. R., & de Chermont, K. (2003) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.129.6.914 · Cited by 617
Variance in faking across noncognitive measures.
McFarland, L. A., & Ryan, A. M. (2000) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.85.5.812 · Cited by 410
Hecht, T. D., & Allen, N. J. (2005) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.07.004 · Cited by 199
Sajjadiani, S., Sojourner, A. J., Kammeyer-Mueller, J. D., & Mykerezi, E. (2019) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/apl0000405 · Cited by 173
Person-Job Cognitive Style Fit for Software Developers: The Effect on Strain and Performance
CHILTON, M. A., HARDGRAVE, B. C., & ARMSTRONG, D. J. (2005) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.2005.11045849 · Cited by 138
Appraisal of Email Use as A Source of Workplace Stress: A Person-Environment Fit Approach
ICN Business School, C., Stich, J.-F., Tarafdar, M., Lancaster University, Stacey, P., Loughborough University, Cooper, S. C., & Alliance Manchester Business School (2019) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1jais.00531 · Cited by 82
Recovery at home and performance at work: A diary study on self–family facilitation
Volman, F. E., Bakker, A. B., & Xanthopoulou, D. (2013) · European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1080/1359432x.2011.648375 · Cited by 77
Work–family conflict and self-discrepant time allocation at work.
Dahm, P. C., Glomb, T. M., Manchester, C. F., & Leroy, S. (2015) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0038542 · Cited by 68
Qin, X., Liu, X., Brown, J. A., Zheng, X., & Owens, B. P. (2021) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-019-04250-4 · Cited by 64
The dynamism of daily justice: A person-environment fit perspective on the situated value of justice
Lennard, A. C., Matta, F. K., Lin, S.-H. (., Koopman, J., & Johnson, R. E. (2022) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2021.1496 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Edwards, J. R., & Van Harrison, R.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Psychology
- Published
- 1993-08
- Volume
- 78
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 628-648
- ISSN
- 0021-9010 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1854
- OpenAlex
- W2131155550
- Cited by
- 318
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 7.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
