Frame-of-reference effects on personality scale scores and criterion-related validity.

Abstract

Increased use of personality inventories in employee selection has led to concerns regarding factors that influence the validity of such measures. A series of studies was conducted to examine the influence of frame of reference on responses to a personality inventory. Study 1 involved both within-subject and between-groups designs to assess the effects of testing situation (general instructions vs. applicant instructions) and item type (work specific vs. noncontextual) on responses to the NEO Five-Factor Inventory (P. T. Costa & R. R. McCrae, 1989). Results indicated that a work-related testing context and workrelated items led to more positive responses. A second study found differences in the validity of a measure of conscientiousness, depending on the frame of reference of respondents. Specifically, context-specific items were found to have greater validity. Implications for personnel selection are discussed.

Cites (9)

1. Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit
   Browne, Michael W., Cudeck, Robert · 1992 · Sociological Methods & Research
2. Comparative fit indexes in structural models.
   Bentler, P. M. · 1990 · Psychological Bulletin
3. Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures.
   P. M. Bentler, Douglas G. Bonett · 1980 · Psychological Bulletin
4. THE BIG FIVE PERSONALITY DIMENSIONS AND JOB PERFORMANCE: A META‐ANALYSIS
   BARRICK, MURRAY R., MOUNT, MICHAEL K. · 1991 · Personnel Psychology
5. Impression management: A literature review and two-component model.
   Leary, Mark R., Kowalski, Robin M. · 1990 · Psychological Bulletin
6. Toward a cognitive social learning reconceptualization of personality
   Mischel, Walter · 1973 · Psychological Review
7. Simultaneous Factor Analysis in Several Populations
   Jöreskog, K. G. · 1971 · Psychometrika
8. Cross-situational generality and the interpersonal circumplex
   Moskowitz, D. S. · 1994 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
9. Was Gordon Allport a trait theorist?
   Zuroff, David C. · 1986 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Show all 9 references

Cited by (12)

1. A Review and Synthesis of the Measurement Invariance Literature: Suggestions, Practices, and Recommendations for Organizational Research
   Vandenberg, Robert J., Lance, Charles E. · 2000 · Organizational Research Methods
2. A meta-analysis of the five-factor model of personality and academic performance.
   Poropat, Arthur E. · 2009 · Psychological Bulletin
3. Individual-Level Cultural Values as Moderators of Perceived Organizational Support–Employee Outcome Relationships in China: Comparing the Effects of Power Distance and Traditionality
   Farh, Jiing-Lih, Hackett, Rick D., Liang, Jian · 2007 · Academy of Management Journal
4. An other perspective on personality: Meta-analytic integration of observers' accuracy and predictive validity.
   Connelly, Brian S., Ones, Deniz S. · 2010 · Psychological Bulletin
5. RECONSIDERING THE USE OF PERSONALITY TESTS IN PERSONNEL SELECTION CONTEXTS
   MORGESON, FREDERICK P., CAMPION, MICHAEL A., DIPBOYE, ROBERT L., HOLLENBECK, JOHN R., MURPHY, KEVIN, SCHMITT, NEAL · 2007 · Personnel Psychology

See all 402