Managerial coping with organizational change: A dispositional perspective.

Timothy A. Judge, Carl J. Thoresen, Vladimir Pucik, Theresa M. Welbourne·1999·Journal of Applied Psychology

Abstract

In a departure from the organizational development literature, this study hypothesized that managerial responses to organizational change are influenced by 7 dispositional traits (locus of control, generalized self-efficacy, self-esteem, positive affectivity, openness to experience, tolerance for ambiguity, and risk aversion). Data were collected from 6 organizations (N = 514) to test the hypotheses. The 7 traits were reduced to 2 factors: Positive Self-Concept and Risk Tolerance. Both of these trait factors significantly predicted self-reports and independent assessments of coping with change. Results also indicated that coping with organizational change was related to extrinsic (salary, job level, plateauing, job performance) and intrinsic (organizational commitment, job satisfaction) career outcomes and that coping mediated roughly half of the relationships between the dispositional factors and these career outcomes. In a recent review of the literature, Quinn, Kahn, and Mandl (1994) noted that research in the field of organizational change and development has evolved from four major paradigms: organizational development, strategic choice, resource dependence-institutional theory, and population ecology. That all four of these paradigms consider change at the organizational level is a telling depiction of the organizational change literature. Research dealing with organizational change has been largely dominated by a macro, systems-oriented focus. Some researchers have called for a more micro, person-oriented focus pertaining to issues important in change (Bray, 1994), yet micro-level research on organizational change remains limited. Studies of individual behavior in relation to organizational change typically have

Cites (14)

  1. Self-efficacy: The exercise of control
    Bandura, Albert, Freeman, W. H., Lightsey, Richard · 1999 · Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy
  2. Society and the Adolescent Self-Image
    Rosenberg, Morris · 1965
  3. Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
    Tversky, Amos, Kahneman, Daniel · 1975 · Utility, Probability, and Human Decision Making
  4. Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement.
    Rotter, Julian B. · 1966 · Psychological Monographs: General and Applied
  5. Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis
    Cohen, Sheldon, Wills, Thomas A. · 1985 · Psychological Bulletin
  6. A review and meta-analysis of the antecedents, correlates, and consequences of organizational commitment.
    Mathieu, John E., Zajac, Dennis M. · 1990 · Psychological Bulletin
  7. The development of markers for the Big-Five factor structure
    Goldberg, Lewis R. · 1992 · Psychological Assessment
  8. The Self-Efficacy Scale: Construction and Validation
    Sherer, Mark, Maddux, James E., Mercandante, Blaise, Prentice-Dunn, Steven, Jacobs, Beth, Rogers, Ronald W. · 1982 · Psychological Reports
  9. Methods of Meta-Analysis
    Hunter, John, Schmidt, Frank · 2004
  10. Measures of Self-Esteem
    Blascovich, Jim, Tomaka, Joseph · 1991 · Measures of Personality and Social Psychological Attitudes

Show all 14 references

Cited by (37)

  1. The job satisfaction–job performance relationship: A qualitative and quantitative review.
    Judge, Timothy A., Thoresen, Carl J., Bono, Joyce E., Patton, Gregory K. · 2001 · Psychological Bulletin
  2. Validation of a New General Self-Efficacy Scale
    Chen, Gilad, Gully, Stanley M., Eden, Dov · 2001 · Organizational Research Methods
  3. Relationship of core self-evaluations traits—self-esteem, generalized self-efficacy, locus of control, and emotional stability—with job satisfaction and job performance: A meta-analysis.
    Judge, Timothy A., Bono, Joyce E. · 2001 · Journal of Applied Psychology
  4. PREDICTORS OF OBJECTIVE AND SUBJECTIVE CAREER SUCCESS: A META‐ANALYSIS
    NG, THOMAS W. H., EBY, LILLIAN T., SORENSEN, KELLY L., FELDMAN, DANIEL C. · 2005 · Personnel Psychology
  5. Five-factor model of personality and job satisfaction: A meta-analysis.
    Judge, Timothy A., Heller, Daniel, Mount, Michael K. · 2002 · Journal of Applied Psychology

See all 1,026

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Managerial coping with organizational change: A dispositional perspective. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0021-9010.84.1.107
The paper
Judge, T. A., Thoresen, C. J., Pucik, V., & Welbourne, T. M. (1999). Managerial coping with organizational change: A dispositional perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.84.1.107

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.