The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Toward an integrative theory of training motivation: A meta-analytic path analysis of 20 years of research.
Abstract
This article meta-analytically summarizes the literature on training motivation, its antecedents, and its relationships with training outcomes such as declarative knowledge, skill acquisition, and transfer. Significant predictors of training motivation and outcomes included individual characteristics (e.g., locus of control, conscientiousness, anxiety, age, cognitive ability, self-efficacy, valence, job involvement) and situational characteristics (e.g., climate). Moreover, training motivation explained incremental variance in training outcomes beyond the effects of cognitive ability. Meta-analytic path analyses further showed that the effects of personality, climate, and age on training outcomes were only partially mediated by self-efficacy, valence, and job involvement. These findings are discussed in terms of their practical significance and their implications for an integrative theory of training motivation.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In fact, conservative estimates posit that for adolescents and adults, academic motivation accounts for approximately 30% of learning, as well as the transfer and/or application of what has been learned (Colquitt, LePine, & Noe, 2000).”
From Malleability, plasticity, and individuality: How children learn and develop in context1 (2019) · cites this paper as Colquitt, LePine, & Noe, 2000
Citations
Cites
Self-efficacy: The exercise of control
Bandura, A., Freeman, W. H., & Lightsey, R. (1999) · Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy · doi:10.1891/0889-8391.13.2.158 · Cited by 46,835
THE BIG FIVE PERSONALITY DIMENSIONS AND JOB PERFORMANCE: A META‐ANALYSIS
BARRICK, M. R., & MOUNT, M. K. (1991) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1991.tb00688.x · Cited by 8,689
Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers.
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1987) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.52.1.81 · Cited by 6,404
Acquisition of cognitive skill
Anderson, J. R. (1982) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.89.4.369 · Cited by 3,663
Kraiger, K., Ford, J. K., & Salas, E. (1993) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.78.2.311 · Cited by 1,831 · cited 3×
“An alternative to Kirkpatrick's (1976) approach has been suggested by Kraiger, Ford, and Salas (1993).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialCollege students' time management: Correlations with academic performance and stress.
Macan, T. H., Shahani, C., Dipboye, R. L., & Phillips, A. P. (1990) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.82.4.760 · Cited by 933
THEORY TESTING: COMBINING PSYCHOMETRIC META‐ANALYSIS AND STRUCTURAL EQUATIONS MODELING
VISWESVARAN, C., & ONES, D. S. (1995) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1995.tb01784.x · Cited by 926
Harrison, J. K. (1992) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.77.6.952 · Cited by 145
Cited by
Sorted by citations
User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward A Unified View1
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/30036540 · Cited by 45,035
Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research.
Colquitt, J. A., Conlon, D. E., Wesson, M. J., Porter, C. O. L. H., & Ng, K. Y. (2001) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.425 · Cited by 5,942
Self-citationThe Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis
(2019) · doi:10.7758/9781610448864 · Cited by 4,553
CHRISTIAN, M. S., GARZA, A. S., & SLAUGHTER, J. E. (2011) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2010.01203.x · Cited by 2,903
Do Psychosocial and Study Skill Factors Predict College Outcomes? A Meta-Analysis.
Robbins, S. B., Lauver, K., Le, H., Davis, D., Langley, R., & Carlstrom, A. (2004) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.130.2.261 · Cited by 2,479
Metadata
- Authors
- Colquitt, J. A., LePine, J. A., & Noe, R. A.
- Affiliations
- University of Florida (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Psychology
- Published
- 2000
- Volume
- 85
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 678-707
- ISSN
- 0021-9010 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1854
- OpenAlex
- W2128070591
- Cited by
- 2,126
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 46 · 2025: 50 · 2024: 66 · 2023: 81 · 2022: 95 · 2021: 105 · 2020: 99 · 2019: 103 · 2018: 103 · 2017: 127 · 2016: 85 · 2015: 139 · 2014: 132 · 2013: 136 · 2012: 115
- FWCI
- 29.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Applied Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Human Resource Development and Performance Evaluation
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
- Social Sciences › Education › Adult and Continuing Education Topics
- Keywords
- training motivation, self-efficacy, valence, job involvement, locus of control, conscientiousness, anxiety, cognitive ability, organizational climate, skill acquisition, knowledge transfer, mediating effect, integrative theory, adult learning
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Inservice Training, Motivation, Psychological Theory, Psychology, Industrial, Regression Analysis, Self Efficacy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
