Minority dissent and team innovation: The importance of participation in decision making.

Carsten K. W. De Dreu, Michael Alun West·2001·Journal of Applied Psychology

Abstract

This study integrates research on minority dissent and individual creativity, as well as team diversity and the quality of group decision making, with research on team participation in decision making. From these lines of research, it was proposed that minority dissent would predict innovation in teams but only when teams have high levels of participation in decision making. This hypothesis was tested in 2 studies, 1 involving a homogeneous sample of self-managed teams and 1 involving a heterogeneous sample of cross-functional teams. Study 1 suggested that a newly developed scale to measure minority dissent has discriminant validity. Both Study 1 and Study 2 showed more innovations under high rather than low levels of minority dissent but only when there was a high degree of participation in team decision making. It is concluded that minority dissent stimulates creativity and divergent thought, which, through participation, manifest as innovation.

Cites (3)

  1. Psychological Safety and Learning Behavior in Work Teams
    Edmondson, Amy · 1999 · Administrative Science Quarterly
  2. Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias
    James, Lawrence R., Demaree, Robert G., Wolf, Gerrit · 1984 · Journal of Applied Psychology
  3. A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict
    Jehn, Karen A. · 1995 · Administrative Science Quarterly

Show all 3 references

Cited by (25)

  1. Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: A meta-analysis.
    De Dreu, Carsten K. W., Weingart, Laurie R. · 2003 · Journal of Applied Psychology
  2. Teams in Organizations: From Input-Process-Output Models to IMOI Models
    Ilgen, Daniel R., Hollenbeck, John R., Johnson, Michael, Jundt, Dustin · 2005 · Annual Review of Psychology
  3. The Benefits of Climate for Inclusion for Gender-Diverse Groups
    Nishii, Lisa H. · 2013 · Academy of Management Journal
  4. Inclusive leadership and employee involvement in creative tasks in the workplace: The mediating role of psychological safety
    Carmeli, Abraham, Reiter-Palmon, Roni, Ziv, Enbal · 2010 · Creativity Research Journal
  5. The routinization of innovation research: a constructively critical review of the state‐of‐the‐science
    Anderson, Neil, De Dreu, Carsten K. W., Nijstad, Bernard A. · 2004 · Journal of Organizational Behavior

See all 1,191

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Minority dissent and team innovation: The importance of participation in decision making. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0021-9010.86.6.1191
The paper
Dreu, C. K. W. D., & West, M. A. (2001). Minority dissent and team innovation: The importance of participation in decision making. Journal of Applied Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.86.6.1191

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.