Minority dissent and team innovation: The importance of participation in decision making.
Abstract
This study integrates research on minority dissent and individual creativity, as well as team diversity and the quality of group decision making, with research on team participation in decision making. From these lines of research, it was proposed that minority dissent would predict innovation in teams but only when teams have high levels of participation in decision making. This hypothesis was tested in 2 studies, 1 involving a homogeneous sample of self-managed teams and 1 involving a heterogeneous sample of cross-functional teams. Study 1 suggested that a newly developed scale to measure minority dissent has discriminant validity. Both Study 1 and Study 2 showed more innovations under high rather than low levels of minority dissent but only when there was a high degree of participation in team decision making. It is concluded that minority dissent stimulates creativity and divergent thought, which, through participation, manifest as innovation.
Cites (3)
- Psychological Safety and Learning Behavior in Work TeamsEdmondson, Amy · 1999 · Administrative Science Quarterly
- Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response biasJames, Lawrence R., Demaree, Robert G., Wolf, Gerrit · 1984 · Journal of Applied Psychology
- A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflictJehn, Karen A. · 1995 · Administrative Science Quarterly
Cited by (25)
- Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: A meta-analysis.De Dreu, Carsten K. W., Weingart, Laurie R. · 2003 · Journal of Applied Psychology
- Teams in Organizations: From Input-Process-Output Models to IMOI ModelsIlgen, Daniel R., Hollenbeck, John R., Johnson, Michael, Jundt, Dustin · 2005 · Annual Review of Psychology
- The Benefits of Climate for Inclusion for Gender-Diverse GroupsNishii, Lisa H. · 2013 · Academy of Management Journal
- Inclusive leadership and employee involvement in creative tasks in the workplace: The mediating role of psychological safetyCarmeli, Abraham, Reiter-Palmon, Roni, Ziv, Enbal · 2010 · Creativity Research Journal
- The routinization of innovation research: a constructively critical review of the state‐of‐the‐scienceAnderson, Neil, De Dreu, Carsten K. W., Nijstad, Bernard A. · 2004 · Journal of Organizational Behavior
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Minority dissent and team innovation: The importance of participation in decision making. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0021-9010.86.6.1191
- The paper
- Dreu, C. K. W. D., & West, M. A. (2001). Minority dissent and team innovation: The importance of participation in decision making. Journal of Applied Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.86.6.1191
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.