The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Inventory of interpersonal problems: Psychometric properties and clinical applications.
Abstract
Un nouvel instrument mesurant la detresse provenant des situations interpersonnelles, le «inventory of Interpersonal Problems» (IIP), est decrit dans ses proprietes psychometriques et dans ses applications cliniques, en particulier dans l'evaluation des effets de la psychotherapie
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“For instance, a robot able to express emotions and use appropriate gaze behaviors was found to inspire cooperative and adaptive behaviors in its human teammates, which resulted in more successful and efficient collaboration compared to robots without emotional expression or with random gaze behaviors [69].”
From A Taxonomy of Social Errors in Human-Robot Interaction (2021) · cites this paper as [69]
In the citing paper
“It has excellent psychometric properties, with 0.75 ≤ α ≤ 0.94. The criterion validity of the measure has been demonstrated via correlations to the SCL-90-R with 0.07 ≤ r ≤ 0.75.”
From The process-outcome mindfulness effects in trainees (PrOMET) study: Protocol of a pragmatic randomized controlled trial (2015) · cites this paper as Horowitz et al. 1988
Citations
Cites
The Revised UCLA Loneliness Scale: concurrent and discriminant validity evidence
Russell, D., Peplau, L. A., & Cutrona, C. E. (1980) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.39.3.472 · Cited by 5,173
The Global Assessment Scale: A Procedure for Measuring Overall Severity of Psychiatric Disturbance
Endicott, J. (1976) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1976.01770060086012 · Cited by 4,982
Loneliness: A Sourcebook of Current Theory, Research and Therapy.
Peplau, L. A., & Perlman, D. (1984) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2068915 · Cited by 1,937
The client satisfaction questionnaire
Attkisson, C. C., & Zwick, R. (1982) · Evaluation and Program Planning · doi:10.1016/0149-7189(82)90074-x · Cited by 1,743
A psychological taxonomy of trait‐descriptive terms: The interpersonal domain
Wiggins, J. S. (1979) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.37.3.395 · Cited by 1,596
The 1982 Interpersonal Circle: A taxonomy for complementarity in human transactions.
Kiesler, D. J. (1983) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.90.3.185 · Cited by 1,289
A 30-item schedule for assessing assertive behavior
Rathus, S. A. (1973) · Behavior Therapy · doi:10.1016/s0005-7894(73)80120-0 · Cited by 1,017
Structural analysis of social behavior.
Benjamin, L. S. (1974) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0037024 · Cited by 1,011
Assessment of patient satisfaction: Development and refinement of a Service Evaluation Questionnaire
Nguyen, T. D., Attkisson, C. C., & Stegner, B. L. (1983) · Evaluation and Program Planning · doi:10.1016/0149-7189(83)90010-1 · Cited by 736
A Measure of Interpersonal Dependency
Hirschfeld, R. M. A., Klerman, G. L., Gouch, H. G., Barrett, J., Korchin, S. J., & Chodoff, P. (1977) · Journal of Personality Assessment · doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa4106_6 · Cited by 557
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 1,001–1,009 of 1,009
Bateman, A., & Fonagy, P. (2010) · Focus · doi:10.1176/foc.8.1.foc55 · Cited by 27
Data-Informed Case Formulation with the Trier Treatment Navigator
Moggia, D., Schaffrath, J., Bommer, J., Weinmann-Lutz, B., & Lutz, W. (2022) · Revista de Psicoterapia · doi:10.33898/rdp.v33i123.35971 · Cited by 4
Shields, C., Murrell, S. A., & Salsman, N. (2006) · Clinical Case Studies · doi:10.1177/1534650103261222 · Cited by 2
Telch (1994) · doi:10.1002/1098-108x(199401)15:1
Fichter (1998) · doi:10.1002/(sici)1098-108x(199811)24:3
French (1997) · doi:10.1002/(sici)1098-108x(199711)22:3
Mussell (1997) · doi:10.1002/(sici)1098-108x(1997)21:4
A randomized prospective study comparing supportive and dynamic therapies. Outcome and alliance.
(1998) · PubMed Central · Cited by 90
Metadata
- Authors
- Horowitz, L. M., Rosenberg, S. E., Baer, B. A., Ureño, G., & Villaseñor, V. S.
- Venue
- Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
- Published
- 1988
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 885-892
- ISSN
- 0022-006X (ISSN-L)
- 1939-2117
- OpenAlex
- W2155175889
- Cited by
- 2,026
- References
- 22
- Citations by year
- 2026: 38 · 2025: 43 · 2024: 43 · 2023: 61 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 49 · 2020: 55 · 2019: 70 · 2018: 72 · 2017: 72 · 2016: 65 · 2015: 83 · 2014: 81 · 2013: 93 · 2012: 79
- FWCI
- 8.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (5r01mh040417-03, 2s07rr005521-29)
- National Institute of Mental Health (R01 MH40417)
- National Center for Research Resources (2 S07 RR05521-24)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
- Keywords
- Inventory of Interpersonal Problems, interpersonal distress, psychometric properties, clinical application, psychotherapy outcome assessment, interpersonal problems
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Mental Disorders, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Middle Aged, Personality Inventory, Psychometrics, Stress, Psychological
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
