The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Treating anxiety disorders in children: Results of a randomized clinical trial.
Abstract
In this study a psychosocial treatment for 47 Ss (aged 9-13 years) with anxiety disorders was investigated. A 16-session cognitive-behavioral treatment was compared with a wait-list condition. Outcome was evaluated using child self-report, parent report, teacher report, cognitive assessment, and behavioral observations. Pretreatment-posttreatment changes and maintenance of gains at 1-year follow-up were examined. Results revealed that many treated Ss were found to be without a diagnosis at posttest and at follow-up and to be within normal limits on many measures. The child's perception of the therapeutic relationship and the therapist's perception of parental involvement were measured but were not related to outcome. Discussion focuses on characteristics of effective child therapy and the need for further research on treatment components and alternative treatment methods.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Being Brave is a parent-child anxiety treatment that was originally designed for school-age, neurotypical children and adapted for a younger population [9, 17, 19].”
From DINOSAUR: an integrated cognitive-behavioral treatment for anxiety in young children with ASD (2021) · cites this paper as [19]
In the citing paper
“Coping Cat is an established evidence-based CBT treatment for pediatric anxiety [180–182] that has been studied rigorously for more than 25 years.”
From A Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trial (SMART) study of medication and CBT sequencing in the treatment of pediatric anxiety disorders (2021) · cites this paper as [180]
In the citing paper
“We will randomly select 1 study case from each clinician (assigned after their initial 2 training cases); a trained fidelity rater will listen to all 12 sessions of this case and rate fidelity using a standardized fidelity checklist developed for Coping Cat [180, 181].”
From A Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trial (SMART) study of medication and CBT sequencing in the treatment of pediatric anxiety disorders (2021) · cites this paper as [180]
In the citing paper
“Coping Cat training has demonstrated effectiveness with clinicians ranging from graduate students [180, 181] to experienced psychotherapists [49], with strong treatment effects in each case.”
From A Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trial (SMART) study of medication and CBT sequencing in the treatment of pediatric anxiety disorders (2021) · cites this paper as [180]
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 1,001–1,005 of 1,005
Anxiety and Fear-Related Disorders: Generalized Anxiety Disorder
Rosellini, A. J., & Brown, T. A. (2024) · Tasman’s Psychiatry · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-51366-5_74 · Cited by 1
Attentional Bias in Anxious Youth: Clinical Applications
Weissman, A. S. (2020) · Journal of Psychology Research · doi:10.17265/2159-5542/2020.12.001 · Cited by 1
La terapia cognitivo-comportamentale contemporanea: teoria, storia ed evidenze empiriche
Thoma, N., Pilecki, B., & McKay, D. (2016) · Psicoterapia e Scienze Umane · doi:10.3280/pu2016-001003
(2009) · Cited by 2,013
Hopko (2000) · doi:10.1002/1520-6394(2000)12:4
Metadata
- Authors
- Kendall, P. C.
- Affiliations
- Temple University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Kendall, Philip C.
- ORCID
- Kendall, Philip C.
- Venue
- Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
- Published
- 1994
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 100-110
- ISSN
- 0022-006X (ISSN-L)
- 1939-2117
- OpenAlex
- W4234517286
- Semantic Scholar
- 846e929c86716d515d2db9844c043d0625c7983c
- Cited by
- 1,376
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 74 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 38 · 2017: 47 · 2016: 37 · 2015: 58 · 2014: 65 · 2013: 68 · 2012: 68
- FWCI
- 24.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (5r01mh044042-05)
- National Institute of Mental Health (MH 44042)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Therapy and Development
- Keywords
- anxiety disorders, children, childhood anxiety, treatment outcomes, randomized controlled trials
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Age Factors, Anxiety Disorders, Child, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Personality Inventory, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Waiting Lists, Reproducibility of Results, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
