Cited by 262Psychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsBehavioral and Psychological StudiesAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Sampling of empirically supported psychological treatments from health psychology: Smoking, chronic pain, cancer, and bulimia nervosa.

Compas, Bruce E., Haaga, David A. F., Keefe, Francis J., Leitenberg, Harold, Williams, David A.·1998·Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

Abstract

Interventions in health psychology and behavioral medicine represent an integral area of research for the development of psychological therapies to enhance health behaviors, manage symptoms and sequelae of disease, treat psychological symptoms and disorders, prolong survival in the face of a life-threatening illness, and improve quality of life. A sampling of interventions in health psychology and behavioral medicine is offered that meet the criteria for empirically supported treatments for smoking cessation, chronic pain, cancer, and bulimia nervosa. Evidence for empirically supported treatments is identified, along with promising interventions that do not yet meet the criteria as outlined by D. L. Chambless and S. D. Hollon (1998). Evidence for the effectiveness and clinical significance of these interventions is reviewed, and issues in this area of research are outlined.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-006x.66.1.89

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Psychological factors play an important role in the experience of persistent pain.

    “During the past 30 years it has become increasingly clear that psychological factors play an important role in the experience of persistent pain.17,28,132”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Compas, B. E., Haaga, D. A. F., Keefe, F. J., Leitenberg, H., & Williams, D. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Vermont (US)
  • American University (US)
  • Duke University (US)
  • Georgetown University (US)
Venue
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
Published
1998
Volume
66
Issue
1
Pages
89-112
ISSN
  • 0022-006X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2117
OpenAlex
W1992968087
Cited by
262
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 28 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 9
FWCI
24.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01ca067936-05)
  • National Cancer Institute (CA67936)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
empirically supported treatments, health psychology interventions, behavioral medicine, smoking cessation, chronic pain, cancer therapy, bulimia nervosa, treatment effectiveness, clinical significance, quality of life
MeSH terms
Adult, Antidepressive Agents, Bulimia, Chronic Disease, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Humans, Neoplasms, Psychotherapy, Smoking, Empiricism, Pain Management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review