Cited by 87Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationPain Management and TreatmentPain Management and Placebo Effect

A controlled study of the effects of applied relaxation and applied relaxation plus operant procedures in the regulation of chronic pain

Linton, Steven J., Götestam, K. Gunnar·1984·British Journal of Clinical Psychology

Abstract

Chronic back/joint pain patients participated in a comparative study of relaxation and operant therapies for chronic pain. Patients were randomly assigned to: (1) a waiting‐list control, or to either (2) an applied relaxation, or (3) an applied relaxation plus operant conditioning treatment programme. Waiting patients were subsequently randomly assigned to active treatment. The results indicated that the treatment groups tended to do significantly better than the waiting‐list control group for pain, medicine use, activity, and depression, but there were few clear differences between the treatment groups. Applied relaxation plus the operant programme was significantly better than relaxation for medicine reduction, and applied relaxation was better than relaxation and operant conditioning for a patient evaluation of reaching treatment goals. Within‐group and single‐subject analyses indicated that there were significant improvements between pre‐ and post‐tests for the treatment groups, but not for the waiting‐list control group. Follow‐up data indicated maintenance, and that applied relaxation had significantly lower pain ratings than applied relaxation plus operant conditioning. Taken as a whole, the results show that applied relaxation can produce significant decreases in pain, and that the addition of an operant programme does not improve pain reductions, but does tend to improve results with activity and especially medicine intake variables.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.2044-8260.1984.tb01303.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Applied relaxation practice leads to reduced pain and anxiety, an increase in perceived control, and reduced symptoms.

    “Applied relaxation, the base ingredient in the present study, originates from behavioral therapy, and its practice leads to reduced pain and anxiety, an increase in perceived control, and reduced symptoms.29, 30, 31, 35”
  • Applied relaxation has previously been evaluated for chronic pain and functions as an active treatment control group.

    “AR has previously been evaluated for chronic pain [39, 40] and functions in this case as an active treatment control group.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Linton, S. J., & Götestam, K. G.
Corresponding author
Götestam, K. Gunnar
Venue
British Journal of Clinical Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1984-11
Volume
23
Issue
4
Pages
291-299
ISSN
  • 0144-6657 (ISSN-L)
  • 2044-8260
OpenAlex
W1976419113
Cited by
86
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • British Journal of Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Pain Management and Placebo Effect
Keywords
applied relaxation, operant conditioning, chronic pain, back pain, joint pain, pain management, medication use, physical activity, depression, maintenance of treatment effects
MeSH terms
Adult, Analgesics, Back Pain, Behavior Therapy, Chronic Disease, Combined Modality Therapy, Conditioning, Operant, Exercise Therapy, Female, Humans, Male, Pain, Random Allocation, Relaxation Therapy, Pain Management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review