CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 290Disability Education and EmploymentSchizophrenia research and treatmentEmployment and Welfare Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 74 of the 79 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Hartford Study of Supported Employment for Persons With Severe Mental Illness.

Mueser, Kim T., Clark, Robin E., Haines, Michael, Drake, Robert E., McHugo, Gregory J., Bond, Gary R., Essock, Susan M., Becker, Deborah R., Wolfe, Rosemarie, Swain, Karin·2004·Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
DOI 10.1037/0022-006x.72.3.479
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The authors compared 3 approaches to vocational rehabilitation for severe mental illness (SMI): the individual placement and support (IPS) model of supported employment, a psychosocial rehabilitation (PSR) program, and standard services. Two hundred four unemployed clients (46% African American, 30% Latino) with SMI were randomly assigned to IPS, PSR, or standard services and followed for 2 years. Clients in IPS had significantly better employment outcomes than clients in PSR and standard services, including more competitive work (73.9% vs. 18.2% vs. 27.5%, respectively) and any paid work (73.9% vs. 34.8% vs. 53.6%, respectively). There were few differences in nonvocational outcomes between programs. IPS is a more effective model than PSR or standard brokered vocational services for improving employment outcomes in clients with SMI.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-006x.72.3.479

Cites

74 of 74 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 79 references

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. Baron, 1997, Vocational rehabilitation., 245
  2. Becker, 1993, A working life: The individual placement and support (IPS) program.
  3. Bond, 1997, A fidelity scale for the Individual Placement and Support model of supported employment., Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 40, 265
  4. 10.1037/0022-006X.63.5.718 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1016/1052-2263(94)00115-I · DOI
  6. First, 1996, Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis-I Disorders-Patient Edition (SCID-I/P, Version 2. 0).
  7. Lehman, 1995, Toolkit for Evaluating Quality of Life for Persons with Severe Mental Illness.
  8. Lovell, 1984, Social Support and Social Network Interview.
  9. 10.1016/1052-2263(94)00117-K · DOI
  10. Malamud, 1988, Transitional employment and psychosocial rehabilitation., 150
  11. Mueser, 1995, Toolkit for Evaluating Substance Abuse in Persons with Severe Mental Illness.
  12. Mueser, 2001, A prospective analysis of work in schizophrenia., Schizophrenia Bulletin, 27, 281, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.schbul.a006874 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 1998, Five state feasibility study on state mental health agency performance measures: Draft Executive Summary.
  14. 2003, Achieving the promise: Transforming mental health care in America. Final report. (DHHS Publication No. SMA-03-3832).
  15. Pratt, 1999, Psychiatric rehabilitation.
  16. Rogers, 1991, Massachusetts survey of client preferences for community support services (Final report).
  17. Rutman, 1985, A comprehensive, national evaluation of transitional employment programs for the psychiatrically disabled (Final report).
  18. Schooler, 1979, Social Adjustment Scale II (SAS-II)., 290
  19. Strauss, 1988, Work as treatment for psychiatric disorder: A puzzle in pieces., 47
  20. 1991, Dictionary of occupational titles
  21. Wahl, 1997, Consumer experience with stigma: Results of a national survey.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 290

Related

Metadata

Authors
Mueser, K. T., Clark, R. E., Haines, M., Drake, R. E., McHugo, G. J., Bond, G. R., Essock, S. M., Becker, D. R., Wolfe, R., & Swain, K.
Affiliations
  • Dartmouth Psychiatric Research Center (US)
  • Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis (US)
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
Publisher
American Psychological Association (APA)
Published
2004-06
Volume
72
Issue
3
Pages
479-490
ISSN
  • 0022-006X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2117
DOI
10.1037/0022-006x.72.3.479
OpenAlex
W2000466950
Cited by
289
References
79
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 45 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 13
FWCI
60.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • The Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) Network (American Medical Association) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5k02mh000842-10)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH-00842, MH-56147, R24MH056147)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Disability Education and Employment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Employment and Welfare Studies
Keywords
severe mental illness, supported employment, Individual Placement and Support, psychosocial rehabilitation, vocational rehabilitation, employment effects, competitive employment, unemployed people, African American clients, Latino clients
MeSH terms
Adult, Mental Disorders, Female, Humans, Male, Severity of Illness Index, Employment, Supported, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review