Cited by 129Disability Education and EmploymentEmployment and Welfare StudiesSchizophrenia research and treatment

A randomized controlled trial comparing two vocational models for persons with severe mental illness.

Bond, Gary R., Salyers, Michelle P., Dincin, Jerry, Drake, Robert E., Becker, Deborah R., Fraser, Virginia V., Haines, Michael·2007·Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

Abstract

The authors compared 2 approaches to vocational rehabilitation for individuals with severe mental illness: the individual placement and support (IPS) model of supported employment and the diversified placement approach (DPA), which emphasizes work readiness and offers a range of vocational options, including agency-run businesses and agency-contracted placements with community employers. In all, 187 unemployed participants with severe mental illness were randomly assigned to IPS or DPA. Over 2 years, IPS had significantly better competitive employment outcomes than DPA. Competitive employment rates over the 2-year follow-up were 75.0% for IPS and 33.7% for DPA. However, IPS and DPA did not differ on paid employment outcomes. The authors conclude that IPS is more effective than DPA in achieving competitive employment, but not paid employment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-006x.75.6.968

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bond, G. R., Salyers, M. P., Dincin, J., Drake, R. E., Becker, D. R., Fraser, V. V., & Haines, M.
Affiliations
  • Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis (US)
  • Thresholds (US)
  • Dartmouth College (US)
Venue
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
Published
2007-12
Volume
75
Issue
6
Pages
968-982
ISSN
  • 0022-006X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2117
OpenAlex
W2003569369
Cited by
129
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 8
FWCI
26.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH59987)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Education and Employment
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Employment and Welfare Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
Keywords
severe mental illness, vocational rehabilitation, Individual Placement and Support, supported employment, competitive employment, paid employment, career readiness, unemployment
MeSH terms
Adult, Mental Disorders, Female, Humans, Male, Rehabilitation, Vocational, Severity of Illness Index, Employment, Supported, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review