Cognitive processes as predictors of word recognition and reading comprehension in learning-disabled and skilled readers: Revisiting the specificity hypothesis.

Swanson, H. Lee, Alexander, Joy E.·1997·Journal of Educational Psychology

Abstract

This study examines how cognitive processes interrelate as well as predict learning-disabled (LD) readers' word recognition and reading comprehension performance. Correlations between phonological, orthographic, semantic, metacognitive, and working memory measures with reading performance were examined in LD and skilled readers ages 8 to 12 years. Important results were (a) LD readers were deficient on all cognitive processes compared with skilled readers, but these differences do not reflect IQ scores; (b) reading ability group differences emerged on a component composed primarily of working memory measures (referred to as g) as well as unique components, suggesting that these differences emerge on both general and specific (modular) processes; (c) g best predicts reading comprehension for both groups; and (d) phonological awareness best predicts skilled readers' pseudoword reading, whereas g best predicts LD readers' pseudoword performance. Overall, LD readers' information processing difficulties were described within a general working memory model that views such children as having difficulty accessing and coordinating both general and specific processes. Results suggest that the cognitive processes that contribute to reading deficits are best understood in the context of their combination with other operations rather than in isolation.

Cites (5)

  1. A capacity theory of comprehension: individual differences in working memory
    Just, Marcel A., Carpenter, Patricia A. · 1992 · Psychological Review
  2. The Development of Hierarchical Factor Solutions
    Schmid, John, Leiman, John M. · 1957 · Psychometrika
  3. The Development of Working Memory in Normally Achieving and Subtypes of Learning Disabled Children
    Siegel, Linda S., Ryan, Ellen B. · 1989 · Child Development
  4. Individual differences in working memory and comprehension: A test of four hypotheses.
    Engle, Randall W., Cantor, Judy, Carullo, Julie J. · 1992 · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition
  5. Development of young readers' phonological processing abilities.
    Wagner, Richard K., Torgesen, Joseph K., Laughon, Pamela, Simmons, Karen, Rashotte, Carol A. · 1993 · Journal of Educational Psychology

Show all 5 references

Cited by (13)

  1. Use of Exploratory Factor Analysis in Published Research: Common Errors and Some Comment on Improved Practice
    Henson, Robin K., Roberts, J. Kyle · 2006 · Educational and Psychological Measurement
  2. Executive functions and achievements in school: Shifting, updating, inhibition, and working memory
    St Clair-Thompson, Helen L., Gathercole, Susan E. · 2006 · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
  3. The Relationship Between Working Memory and Mathematical Problem Solving in Children at Risk and Not at Risk for Serious Math Difficulties.
    Swanson, H. Lee, Beebe-Frankenberger, Margaret · 2004 · Journal of Educational Psychology
  4. A meta-analysis on the relation between reading and working memory
    Peng, Peng, Barnes, Marcia, Wang, CuiCui, Wang, Wei, Li, Shan, Swanson, H. Lee, Dardick, William, Tao, Sha · 2018 · Psychological Bulletin
  5. Mathematical problem solving and working memory in children with learning disabilities: Both executive and phonological processes are important
    Swanson, H.Lee, Sachse-Lee, Carole · 2001 · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology

See all 174

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cognitive processes as predictors of word recognition and reading comprehension in learning-disabled and skilled readers: Revisiting the specificity hypothesis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0022-0663.89.1.128
The paper
Swanson, H. L., & Alexander, J. E. (1997). Cognitive processes as predictors of word recognition and reading comprehension in learning-disabled and skilled readers: Revisiting the specificity hypothesis. Journal of Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-0663.89.1.128

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.