A new tool for measuring and understanding individual differences in the component processes of reading comprehension.

Brenda Ann Marie Hannon, Meredyth Daneman·2001·Journal of Educational Psychology

Abstract

grantor: University of Toronto

Cites (4)

  1. A capacity theory of comprehension: individual differences in working memory
    Just, Marcel A., Carpenter, Patricia A. · 1992 · Psychological Review
  2. Long-term working memory.
    Ericsson, K. Anders, Kintsch, Walter · 1995 · Psychological Review
  3. Working memory, short-term memory, and general fluid intelligence: A latent-variable approach.
    Engle, Randall W., Tuholski, Stephen W., Laughlin, James E., Conway, Andrew R. A. · 1999 · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
  4. Short-term retention of individual verbal items.
    Peterson, Lloyd, Peterson, Margaret Jean · 1959 · Journal of Experimental Psychology

Show all 4 references

Cited by (5)

  1. Children's Reading Comprehension Ability: Concurrent Prediction by Working Memory, Verbal Ability, and Component Skills.
    Cain, Kate, Oakhill, Jane, Bryant, Peter · 2004 · Journal of Educational Psychology
  2. Why does working memory capacity predict variation in reading comprehension? On the influence of mind wandering and executive attention.
    McVay, Jennifer C., Kane, Michael J. · 2012 · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
  3. A meta-analysis on the relation between reading and working memory
    Peng, Peng, Barnes, Marcia, Wang, CuiCui, Wang, Wei, Li, Shan, Swanson, H. Lee, Dardick, William, Tao, Sha · 2018 · Psychological Bulletin
  4. Prior knowledge, reading skill, and text cohesion in the comprehension of science texts
    Ozuru, Yasuhiro, Dempsey, Kyle, McNamara, Danielle S. · 2009 · Learning and Instruction
  5. Differential Competencies Contributing to Children's Comprehension of Narrative and Expository Texts
    Best, Rachel M., Floyd, Randy G., Mcnamara, Danielle S. · 2008 · Reading Psychology

See all 258

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A new tool for measuring and understanding individual differences in the component processes of reading comprehension. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0022-0663.93.1.103
The paper
Hannon, B. A. M., & Daneman, M. (2001). A new tool for measuring and understanding individual differences in the component processes of reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-0663.93.1.103

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.