Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 503

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 79 of the 79 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Native Spanish-Speaking Children Reading in English: Toward a Model of Comprehension.

Proctor, C. Patrick, Carlo, María, August, Diane, Snow, Catherine·2005·Journal of Educational Psychology

Abstract

A structural equation model of second language (L2; English) reading comprehension was tested on a sample of 135 Spanish-speaking 4th-grade English-language learners (ELLs). The model included 2 levels: decoding and oral language. English decoding measures included alphabetic knowledge and fluency. English oral language measures included vocabulary knowledge and listening comprehension. The model had reasonable goodness of fit. Decoding skills played a less predictive role than oral language proficiency. L2 listening comprehension made an independent, proximal contribution to L2 reading comprehension, whereas L2 vocabulary knowledge assumed both proximal and distal relationships with L2 reading comprehension. Results suggest that, given adequate L2 decoding ability, L2 vocabulary knowledge is crucial for improved English reading comprehension outcomes for Spanish-speaking ELLs.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-0663.97.2.246

Cites

79 of 79 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 79 references

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. August, 1997, Improving schooling for language-minority students: A research agenda.
  2. Blachman, 2000, Phonological awareness., Vol. 3, 483
  3. Coady, 1993, Research on ESL/EFL vocabulary acquisition: Putting it in context., 3
  4. 10.2307/1170735 · doi:10.2307/1170735
  5. Haynes, 1993, American and Chinese readers learning from lexical familiarizations in English text., 130
  6. 10.2307/1163499 · doi:10.2307/1163499
  7. 10.1037/0022-0663.78.4.243 · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.78.4.243 · Paper page
  8. Koda, 1997, Orthographic knowledge in L2 lexical processing: A cross-linguistic perspective., 35
  9. Nagy, 2000, Vocabulary processes., Vol. 3, 269
  10. Perfetti, 1985, Reading ability.
  11. Perfetti, 1987, Phonemic knowledge and learning to read are reciprocal: A longitudinal study of first grade children., Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 33, 283
  12. Saragoza, 1998, Who counts? Title VII and the Hispanic classification., 44
  13. 10.1037/0022-0663.85.3.509 · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.85.3.509
  14. Ulijn, 1981, Conceptual and syntactic strategies in reading a foreign language., Vol. 9, 129
  15. Woodcock, 1991, WLPB-R: Examiner's manual.

Cited by

See all 503

Metadata

Authors
Proctor, C. P., Carlo, M., August, D., & Snow, C.
Venue
Journal of Educational Psychology
Published
2005-05
Volume
97
Issue
2
Pages
246-256
ISSN
  • 0022-0663 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2176
OpenAlex
W2026738852
Cited by
503
References
79
FWCI
17.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Native Spanish-Speaking Children Reading in English: Toward a Model of Comprehension. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/0022-0663.97.2.246
The paper
Proctor, C. P., Carlo, M., August, D., & Snow, C. (2005). Native Spanish-Speaking Children Reading in English: Toward a Model of Comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.97.2.246

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.