Cited by 754Motivation and Self-Concept in SportsEducation, Achievement, and GiftednessInnovative Teaching and Learning Methods

Autonomous, controlled, and amotivated types of academic motivation: A person-oriented analysis.

Ratelle, Catherine F., Guay, Frédéric, Vallerand, Robert J., Larose, Simon, Senécal, Caroline·2007·Journal of Educational Psychology

Abstract

The authors investigated students ’ profiles regarding autonomous, controlled, and amotivated regulation and tested whether profile groups differed on some academic adjustment outcomes. Studies 1 and 2 performed on high school students revealed 3 profiles: (a) students with high levels of both controlled motivation and amotivation but low levels of autonomous motivation, (b) students with high levels of both controlled and autonomous motivation but low levels of amotivation, and (c) students with moderate levels of both autonomous and controlled motivations but low levels of amotivation. These first 2 studies revealed that students in the high autonomous/high controlled group reported the highest degree of academic adjustment. Study 3 performed on college students revealed 3 profiles: (a) students with high levels of autonomous motivations but low levels of both controlled motivation and amotivation, (b) students with high levels of both autonomous and controlled motivation but low levels of amotivation, and (c) students with low to moderate levels of the various motivational components. Study 3 indicated that students in the autonomous group were more persistent than students in the other groups. Results are discussed in light of self-determination theory (E. L. Deci & R. M. Ryan, 1985).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-0663.99.4.734

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • These forms of similarity are not inconsistent with the acknowledgement that work motivation can be partly situational or context dependent at the individual level.

    “Importantly, these forms of similarity are not inconsistent with the acknowledgement that work motivation can be partly situational (Ratelle, Guay, Vallerand, Larose, & Senécal, 2007) or context dependant (Gagné & Deci, 2005) at the individual level.”

    From A test of work motivation profile similarity across four distinct samples of employees (2020) · cites this paper as Ratelle, Guay, Vallerand, Larose, & Senécal, 2007

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ratelle, C. F., Guay, F., Vallerand, R. J., Larose, S., & Senécal, C.
Affiliations
  • Université Laval (CA)
  • Université du Québec à Montréal (CA)
Venue
Journal of Educational Psychology
Published
2007-11
Volume
99
Issue
4
Pages
734-746
ISSN
  • 0022-0663 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2176
OpenAlex
W2100355202
Cited by
754
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 36 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 58 · 2023: 48 · 2022: 57 · 2021: 49 · 2020: 63 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 50 · 2017: 41 · 2016: 52 · 2015: 50 · 2014: 34 · 2013: 32 · 2012: 39
FWCI
19.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Educational Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • Corpus Université Laval (Université Laval) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Canada Research Chairs
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
Keywords
academic motivation, autonomous motivation, controlled motivation, amotivation, motivational profiles, academic adjustment, persistence, self-determination theory, high school students, university students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review